Your portfolio starts here.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company research on Shopify Inc. (SHOP), including the business, investment thesis, risks, and valuation.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company exposure across accounts and funds
Share of portfolio value by account
Signals that deserve a closer look
All accounts · September reference prices
| Company | Portfolio weight | Average cost / share | Current price | Return on cost | Research zone |
|---|
Only the designated FolioFacts administrator should sign in. Public user accounts are not available.
Continue with Google →Showing holdings in selected accounts.
Enter a holding and its account details.
Start with an existing export, or use our template.
Only the holdings you confirm are saved.
| Company | Account | Weight | Return | Shares | Cost basis | Value | Price date | Actions |
|---|
Delete your saved portfolio to remove its positions from this site’s active storage.
Ratings, opportunity scores, and fair values are independent research opinions based on stated assumptions—not personalized investment recommendations. Read our Disclaimer.
Search the US ticker directory by company or symbol. Tickers not found require your confirmation before adding.
| Watchlist rank | Company | Research tier | Zone | Price used | Quality | Model opportunity | Return to fair value | Fair value | Actions |
|---|
Watchlist ranks compare displayed Opportunity Scores across the full list. Filters keep those ranks; equal scores share a rank. Opportunity Scores remain research-model snapshots.
Explore full company reports, business fundamentals, and valuation analysis. Search by name, ticker, or tracking tier.
Price snapshot: 2026-11-03 · Research: 2026-10-21 · Saved analysis, not live market data
Ratings and fair values are independent, dated research opinions—not personalized investment advice. Disclaimer
The reference price is above the probability-weighted fair value.
Dashed marker: reference price $142.57. Scenario values are present fair values, not dated price targets.
3Y revenue CAGR 15%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.80 after compensation; 25× P/E; 13% discount rate; Growth and pricing normalize; 2029 economic EPS is $1.80.
Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible3Y revenue CAGR 26%; sustainable 2029 EPS $4.00 after compensation; 38× P/E; 13% discount rate; Merchant expansion and leverage produce $4 of 2029 economic EPS.
Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress3Y revenue CAGR 36%; sustainable 2029 EPS $7.00 after compensation; 48× P/E; 13% discount rate; Strong enterprise and international adoption produce $7 of 2029 economic EPS.
Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assuredFolioFacts zones calculated from the saved fair and bear values at the dated reference price. Live zones can change with research.
Merchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. Q2 revenue grew 34% with an 18% FCF margin. The challenge is valuation: the market already discounts years of strong growth and margin expansion. AI can broaden merchant capabilities but may also change discovery, distribution and the economics of storefront software.
Reported FY totals, current FY quarters and cumulative YTD are grouped separately.
Scale within group: $12B
Scale within group: $3.8B
Scale within group: $12B
Completed FY, standalone current-year quarters and cumulative YTD. No TTM figures.
Each row covers a completed fiscal year. Scale within this group: $2.2B.
Each row covers an independent quarter; derived cash flow is labeled. Scale within this group: $0.82B.
YTD totals overlap the quarters above and must not be added to them. Scale within this group: $2B.
Each annual, quarter and YTD group uses a separate scale. SBC / FCF is a same-period comparison, not a literal employee cash payment. N/M means FCF is zero or negative (or SBC is negative); missing is not zero. Issuer FCF definitions may vary.
Only completed fiscal years and currently open fiscal-year quarters/YTD appear in charts. Standalone quarters and cumulative YTD are separate; missing is never zero. Legacy TTM rows remain in archival source text. The full financial profile below preserves definitions, accounting caveats, and period-end balance details.
This score uses the saved price and research fundamentals. Creator Watchlist calculates the current score and rank using verified market prices.
Watch the evidence behind the thesis, not just the ticker.
Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 26% annual growth on a comparable basis
Growth remains below the 15% bear assumption over a full operating cycle
Affects: Revenue outlook and scenario probabilitiesAfter-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 20.0%
Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable
Affects: Margins, moat score and valuation multipleFinancing and compensation remain consistent with 1,329.1M economic shares in the 2029 base case
Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings
Affects: Financial score, confidence and downside valueMerchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. Q2 revenue grew 34% with an 18% FCF margin. The challenge is valuation: the market already discounts years of strong growth and margin expansion. AI can broaden merchant capabilities but may also change discovery, distribution and the economics of storefront software.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Merchant growth, retention and payment penetration | Merchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. |
| AI commerce distribution and ecosystem relevance | Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value. |
| Economic margins versus valuation expectations | TTM revenue was approximately $13.27 billion and FCF $2.35 billion, against SBC of $482 million. |
Shopify supplies merchant storefronts, commerce software, payments, point of sale and related services. Subscription solutions provide recurring platform revenue, while merchant solutions monetize payment volume and additional services. The ecosystem spans small merchants, larger brands, developers and partners. Its asset-light platform model differs from Amazon's marketplace and logistics ownership, making Amazon a competitive reference rather than a mechanically comparable valuation peer.
Shopify supplies merchant storefronts, commerce software, payments, point of sale and related services. Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value.
Digital commerce, omnichannel retail and international expansion support a substantial runway. Competition includes enterprise suites, open-source tools, marketplaces and integrated payment platforms. GMV and global retail spending should not be treated as revenue at a fixed take rate.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WooCommerce — Automattic | Direct: merchant storefronts and commerce software | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for merchant-platform selection | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| BigCommerce; Adobe Commerce | Direct: merchant commerce platforms | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for online storefronts | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Amazon (AMZN) | Substitute/segment-specific: marketplace selling and commerce services | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for merchant channel spending | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Stripe (private) | Segment-specific: merchant payments and embedded checkout | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Overlap is limited to selected payment functions | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
GMV and global retail spending should not be treated as revenue at a fixed take rate. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Storefront platforms are the closest operating alternatives. Amazon is an alternative sales channel, Stripe can be a partner and payments competitor, and Global-e is a cross-border enablement partner rather than an equivalent core commerce platform.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WooCommerce — Automattic | No consistent comparable series | Direct: merchant storefronts and commerce software | Open-source customization and WordPress ecosystem | Merchant manages more hosting/integration work | Competes for merchant-platform selection |
| BigCommerce; Adobe Commerce | No consistent comparable series | Direct: merchant commerce platforms | Enterprise storefront and integration capabilities | Different customer and deployment mix | Competes for online storefronts |
| Amazon (AMZN) | No consistent comparable series | Substitute/segment-specific: marketplace selling and commerce services | Marketplace demand and fulfillment distribution | Not a merchant-owned storefront or pure software model | Competes for merchant channel spending |
| Stripe (private) | No consistent comparable series | Segment-specific: merchant payments and embedded checkout | Developer payments infrastructure | Also an enabling partner; not a complete storefront substitute | Overlap is limited to selected payment functions |
An extensive developer and partner ecosystem, merchant workflows and integrated payments create strong switching costs and network benefits. Merchants can still choose competing platforms, and changes in shopping interfaces may shift distribution power.
Moat direction: Strengthening — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
An extensive developer and partner ecosystem, merchant workflows and integrated payments create strong switching costs and network benefits. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2026. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 8,880 | 25.78% | 50.36% | 14.04% | 1,597 | 17.98% | 430 | 1,302 | 5,514 | 1,126 |
| FY2025 | 11,556 | 30.14% | 48.07% | 16.42% | 2,007 | 17.37% | 449 | 1,305 | 5,847 | 188 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $3,170 | N/D | 48.8% | 12.1% | $476 (derived: CFO - capex) | 15.0% | $132M (derived from reported periods) | 1,303.358 | $1,848 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $3,583 | N/D | 47.7% | 13.6% | $654 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 18.3% | $128M | 1,297.941 | $1,656 | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $6,753 | N/D | 48.2% | 12.9% | $1,130 (derived: CFO - capex) | 16.7% | $260M | 1,302.628 | $1,656 | N/D |
| Q3 FY2026 | $3,742 | N/D | 47.6% | 15.2% | $816 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 21.8% | $140M | 1,290.727 | $1,868 | N/D |
| 9M FY2026 | $10,495 | N/D | 48.0% | 13.7% | $1,946 (derived: CFO - capex) | 18.5% | $400M | 1,298.618 | $1,868 | N/D |
TTM revenue was approximately $13.27 billion and FCF $2.35 billion, against SBC of $482 million. Cash generation is strong, but the verified market snapshot valued the business at a substantial sales and cash-flow premium. Scenario EPS includes compensation and continuing reinvestment rather than assuming all gross-profit growth reaches owners.
Financial direction: Improving — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $142.57 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $223.21B |
| Enterprise Value | $217.91B |
| Trailing P/E | 117.09 |
| Provider forward P/E | 82.86 |
| EV / Sales | 16.42 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP — Shopify Inc. | Subject company | Public | 82.86 | 16.42 | merchant commerce platform; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 27.95%; operating margin 17.83% |
| WooCommerce; Stripe | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Unquoted operating businesses | N/A | N/A | open-source commerce and payments alternatives; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
| AMZN — Amazon | Alternative merchant channel/selected services; not a like-for-like SaaS peer | Public | 27.92 | 3.82 | cloud infrastructure, marketplace and logistics; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 15.35%; operating margin 12.08% |
| WooCommerce — Automattic | Direct: merchant storefronts and commerce software | Private | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for merchant-platform selection |
| BigCommerce; Adobe Commerce | Direct: merchant commerce platforms | Mixed / standalone valuation not used | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for online storefronts |
Comparable takeaway: Storefront platforms are the closest operating alternatives. Amazon is an alternative sales channel, Stripe can be a partner and payments competitor, and Global-e is a cross-border enablement partner rather than an equivalent core commerce platform. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 38×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 82.86×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $229.70, versus the central base FV of $105.34. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 15%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.80 after compensation; 25× P/E; 13% discount rate; Growth and pricing normalize; 2029 economic EPS is $1.80. | $31.19 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -78.1% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 26%; sustainable 2029 EPS $4.00 after compensation; 38× P/E; 13% discount rate; Merchant expansion and leverage produce $4 of 2029 economic EPS. | $105.34 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | -26.1% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 36%; sustainable 2029 EPS $7.00 after compensation; 48× P/E; 13% discount rate; Strong enterprise and international adoption produce $7 of 2029 economic EPS. | $232.86 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +63.3% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $118.68 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | -16.8% |
Management has strengthened focus on the commerce platform and financial discipline. Future capital allocation should maintain that focus while responding to AI-driven channel changes. Monitor merchant economics, pricing power and per-share returns from new products.
Monitor merchant economics, pricing power and per-share returns from new products.
Analyzed call: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A · Research snapshot: 2026-10-21
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Wong / Oppenheimer | How much AI-commerce and search traffic is incremental? | Management said AI traffic is largely incremental. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Bryan Smilek / JPMorgan | How do enterprise wins expand solution adoption? | Management said customers are adopting more solutions. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Mike Morton / MoffettNathanson | Where is the addressable market expanding? | Management said international markets and more mature merchants expand the opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Terry Tillman / Truist Securities | How do catalog and onboarding tools improve merchant outcomes? | Management said AI tools improve early merchant success. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Adam Wood / Morgan Stanley | How are Sidekick use cases evolving? | Management said customer needs are moving from initial setup toward analytics. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Deepak Mathivanan / Cantor | How are AI-model serving costs being managed? | Management said distilled models reduce serving costs. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Todd Coupland / CIBC | What affects comparisons of free-cash-flow margin? | Management said changes in merchant financing affect the comparison. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Gabriela Borges / Goldman | How does the platform support headless commerce? | Management said its open ecosystem supports merchant choice. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Arjun Bhatia / William Blair | How mature is agentic purchasing adoption? | Management said there is early traction, while adoption continues to develop. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
AI appears to expand merchant activity and product usage, with enterprise customers adopting more services. Financing presentation and reinvestment complicate the cash-margin comparison, and sustained conversion remains the test.
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify Delivers Big: 30%+ Growth Across GMV, Revenue, Gross Profit, and Free Cash Flow | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| SHOP complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| SHOP regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| SHOP valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| SHOP historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| SHOP historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| SHOP historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Amazon statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| 2025 10-K — platform, ecosystem and competition | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | FY2025; checked 2026-10-28 | Commerce-platform and channel distinctions; partner relationships |
| SEC XBRL company facts — SHOP | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2026, through 2026-09-30 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
| Issuer SBC/FCF interim disclosure — SHOP | Issuer earnings exhibit / 10-Q | Current FY quarter/YTD through 2026-11-07 | Issuer-reported same-period SBC or FCF (including documented cumulative differences) |
Company: Shopify Inc.
Ticker: SHOP
Exchange: Nasdaq
Sector / Industry: Technology / merchant commerce platform
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $142.57 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: No
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2025, FY 2024; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Company: Shopify Inc.
Ticker: SHOP
Exchange: Nasdaq
Sector / Industry: Technology / merchant commerce platform
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $142.57 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: No
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2025, FY 2024; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Current Review: 2026-10-28
Previous Review: 2026-10-21
Update Trigger: Competitor relevance and analyst-Q&A correction
| Area | Previous View | Current View | Investment Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition | Preceding operating and comparable-company classifications | Product/customer/geographic boundaries corrected; direct rivals separated from substitutes, partners and valuation anchors | Corrects the competitive comparison; does not by itself re-underwrite the valuation |
| Analyst questions | Prior source-linked Q&A summaries | Complete questions and sentence-form management answers; all 9 existing rows retained | Improves readability while preserving the recorded exchange meaning |
| Valuation and scores | Approved operating/price snapshots, scenarios, scores and decisions | Preserved | No price refresh, rerank or change to valuation assumptions in this correction pass |
Thesis: No new fundamental thesis determination is made in this correction pass. The prior investment decision is preserved; the corrected competitive scope should govern the next substantive review.
| Metric | Current View |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $142.57 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Rating / Zone Status | Avoid |
| Bear / Base / Bull Fair Value | $31.19 / $105.34 / $232.86 |
| Scenario Probabilities | 25% / 50% / 25% |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | $118.68 |
| Probability-Weighted Expected Return | -16.8% |
| Bear-Case Return | -78.1% |
| Strong Buy Zone | ≤ $34.31 |
| Buy Zone | >$34.31–$94.94 |
| Avoid Chasing Above | > $131.87 |
| Quality Score / Tier | 88.5 / Tier A |
| Opportunity Score / Rank | 41.3 / #56 of 76 |
| Risk Level | Medium |
| Tracking / Ownership | Primary Watchlist / Not Owned |
Decision rationale: SHOP is Avoid at $173.48, with -31.6% probability-weighted upside and -82.0% bear-case return. Merchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. Confidence is 60/100 because the earnings conversion, competitive and capital assumptions below remain conditional.
Merchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. Q2 revenue grew 34% with an 18% FCF margin. The challenge is valuation: the market already discounts years of strong growth and margin expansion. AI can broaden merchant capabilities but may also change discovery, distribution and the economics of storefront software.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Merchant growth, retention and payment penetration | Merchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. |
| AI commerce distribution and ecosystem relevance | Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value. |
| Economic margins versus valuation expectations | TTM revenue was approximately $13.27 billion and FCF $2.35 billion, against SBC of $482 million. |
Shopify supplies merchant storefronts, commerce software, payments, point of sale and related services. Subscription solutions provide recurring platform revenue, while merchant solutions monetize payment volume and additional services. The ecosystem spans small merchants, larger brands, developers and partners. Its asset-light platform model differs from Amazon's marketplace and logistics ownership, making Amazon a competitive reference rather than a mechanically comparable valuation peer.
Shopify supplies merchant storefronts, commerce software, payments, point of sale and related services. Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value.
Digital commerce, omnichannel retail and international expansion support a substantial runway. Competition includes enterprise suites, open-source tools, marketplaces and integrated payment platforms. GMV and global retail spending should not be treated as revenue at a fixed take rate.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WooCommerce — Automattic | Direct: merchant storefronts and commerce software | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for merchant-platform selection | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| BigCommerce; Adobe Commerce | Direct: merchant commerce platforms | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for online storefronts | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Amazon (AMZN) | Substitute/segment-specific: marketplace selling and commerce services | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for merchant channel spending | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Stripe (private) | Segment-specific: merchant payments and embedded checkout | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Overlap is limited to selected payment functions | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
GMV and global retail spending should not be treated as revenue at a fixed take rate. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value. Merchant-solutions mix can lower gross margin while increasing total gross profit. The relevant test is economic profit and cash per share after compensation, not GMV growth alone.
The economic test is Economic margins versus valuation expectations. The relevant test is economic profit and cash per share after compensation, not GMV growth alone.
Storefront platforms are the closest operating alternatives. Amazon is an alternative sales channel, Stripe can be a partner and payments competitor, and Global-e is a cross-border enablement partner rather than an equivalent core commerce platform.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WooCommerce — Automattic | No consistent comparable series | Direct: merchant storefronts and commerce software | Open-source customization and WordPress ecosystem | Merchant manages more hosting/integration work | Competes for merchant-platform selection |
| BigCommerce; Adobe Commerce | No consistent comparable series | Direct: merchant commerce platforms | Enterprise storefront and integration capabilities | Different customer and deployment mix | Competes for online storefronts |
| Amazon (AMZN) | No consistent comparable series | Substitute/segment-specific: marketplace selling and commerce services | Marketplace demand and fulfillment distribution | Not a merchant-owned storefront or pure software model | Competes for merchant channel spending |
| Stripe (private) | No consistent comparable series | Segment-specific: merchant payments and embedded checkout | Developer payments infrastructure | Also an enabling partner; not a complete storefront substitute | Overlap is limited to selected payment functions |
An extensive developer and partner ecosystem, merchant workflows and integrated payments create strong switching costs and network benefits. Merchants can still choose competing platforms, and changes in shopping interfaces may shift distribution power.
Moat direction: Strengthening — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
An extensive developer and partner ecosystem, merchant workflows and integrated payments create strong switching costs and network benefits. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2026. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 8,880 | 25.78% | 50.36% | 14.04% | 1,597 | 17.98% | 430 | 1,302 | 5,514 | 1,126 |
| FY2025 | 11,556 | 30.14% | 48.07% | 16.42% | 2,007 | 17.37% | 449 | 1,305 | 5,847 | 188 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $3,170 | N/D | 48.8% | 12.1% | $476 (derived: CFO - capex) | 15.0% | $132M (derived from reported periods) | 1,303.358 | $1,848 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $3,583 | N/D | 47.7% | 13.6% | $654 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 18.3% | $128M | 1,297.941 | $1,656 | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $6,753 | N/D | 48.2% | 12.9% | $1,130 (derived: CFO - capex) | 16.7% | $260M | 1,302.628 | $1,656 | N/D |
| Q3 FY2026 | $3,742 | N/D | 47.6% | 15.2% | $816 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 21.8% | $140M | 1,290.727 | $1,868 | N/D |
| 9M FY2026 | $10,495 | N/D | 48.0% | 13.7% | $1,946 (derived: CFO - capex) | 18.5% | $400M | 1,298.618 | $1,868 | N/D |
TTM revenue was approximately $13.27 billion and FCF $2.35 billion, against SBC of $482 million. Cash generation is strong, but the verified market snapshot valued the business at a substantial sales and cash-flow premium. Scenario EPS includes compensation and continuing reinvestment rather than assuming all gross-profit growth reaches owners.
Financial direction: Improving — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
Management has strengthened focus on the commerce platform and financial discipline. Future capital allocation should maintain that focus while responding to AI-driven channel changes. Monitor merchant economics, pricing power and per-share returns from new products.
Monitor merchant economics, pricing power and per-share returns from new products.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $142.57 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $223.21B |
| Enterprise Value | $217.91B |
| Trailing P/E | 117.09 |
| Provider forward P/E | 82.86 |
| EV / Sales | 16.42 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP — Shopify Inc. | Subject company | Public | 82.86 | 16.42 | merchant commerce platform; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 27.95%; operating margin 17.83% |
| WooCommerce; Stripe | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Unquoted operating businesses | N/A | N/A | open-source commerce and payments alternatives; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
| AMZN — Amazon | Alternative merchant channel/selected services; not a like-for-like SaaS peer | Public | 27.92 | 3.82 | cloud infrastructure, marketplace and logistics; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 15.35%; operating margin 12.08% |
| WooCommerce — Automattic | Direct: merchant storefronts and commerce software | Private | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for merchant-platform selection |
| BigCommerce; Adobe Commerce | Direct: merchant commerce platforms | Mixed / standalone valuation not used | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for online storefronts |
Comparable takeaway: Storefront platforms are the closest operating alternatives. Amazon is an alternative sales channel, Stripe can be a partner and payments competitor, and Global-e is a cross-border enablement partner rather than an equivalent core commerce platform. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 38×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 82.86×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $229.70, versus the central base FV of $105.34. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 15%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.80 after compensation; 25× P/E; 13% discount rate; Growth and pricing normalize; 2029 economic EPS is $1.80. | $31.19 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -78.1% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 26%; sustainable 2029 EPS $4.00 after compensation; 38× P/E; 13% discount rate; Merchant expansion and leverage produce $4 of 2029 economic EPS. | $105.34 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | -26.1% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 36%; sustainable 2029 EPS $7.00 after compensation; 48× P/E; 13% discount rate; Strong enterprise and international adoption produce $7 of 2029 economic EPS. | $232.86 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +63.3% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $118.68 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | -16.8% |
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Wong / Oppenheimer | How much AI-commerce and search traffic is incremental? | Management said AI traffic is largely incremental. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Bryan Smilek / JPMorgan | How do enterprise wins expand solution adoption? | Management said customers are adopting more solutions. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Mike Morton / MoffettNathanson | Where is the addressable market expanding? | Management said international markets and more mature merchants expand the opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Terry Tillman / Truist Securities | How do catalog and onboarding tools improve merchant outcomes? | Management said AI tools improve early merchant success. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Adam Wood / Morgan Stanley | How are Sidekick use cases evolving? | Management said customer needs are moving from initial setup toward analytics. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Deepak Mathivanan / Cantor | How are AI-model serving costs being managed? | Management said distilled models reduce serving costs. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Todd Coupland / CIBC | What affects comparisons of free-cash-flow margin? | Management said changes in merchant financing affect the comparison. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Gabriela Borges / Goldman | How does the platform support headless commerce? | Management said its open ecosystem supports merchant choice. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Arjun Bhatia / William Blair | How mature is agentic purchasing adoption? | Management said there is early traction, while adoption continues to develop. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
AI appears to expand merchant activity and product usage, with enterprise customers adopting more services. Financing presentation and reinvestment complicate the cash-margin comparison, and sustained conversion remains the test.
| Driver | Current State | Positive Trigger / Catalyst | Negative Trigger / Falsifier | What It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merchant growth, retention and payment penetration | Merchant scale, payments adoption and a large ecosystem can sustain attractive growth and per-share cash generation. | Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 26% annual growth on a comparable basis | Growth remains below the 15% bear assumption over a full operating cycle | Revenue outlook and scenario probabilities |
| AI commerce distribution and ecosystem relevance | Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value. | After-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 20.0% | Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable | Margins, moat score and valuation multiple |
| Economic margins versus valuation expectations | TTM revenue was approximately $13.27 billion and FCF $2.35 billion, against SBC of $482 million. | Financing and compensation remain consistent with 1,329.1M economic shares in the 2029 base case | Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings | Financial score, confidence and downside value |
| Component | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business durability and economics | 91 | 25% | 22.8 | Merchant retention, payment penetration, gross profit per merchant, enterprise adoption and acquisition efficiency drive value. |
| Moat and competitive position | 90 | 25% | 22.5 | An extensive developer and partner ecosystem, merchant workflows and integrated payments create strong switching costs and network benefits. |
| Growth runway and durability | 91 | 20% | 18.2 | Digital commerce, omnichannel retail and international expansion support a substantial runway. |
| Financial quality and balance sheet | 85 | 15% | 12.8 | TTM revenue was approximately $13.27 billion and FCF $2.35 billion, against SBC of $482 million. |
| Management, governance and capital allocation | 82 | 15% | 12.3 | Management has strengthened focus on the commerce platform and financial discipline. |
| Quality Score | 88.5 | 100% | 88.5 | Weighted score, independent of ownership and current price |
| Component | Raw Input | Normalized Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 88.5 | 88.5 | 30% | 26.6 |
| Probability-weighted upside | -16.8% | 16.5 | 35% | 5.8 |
| Bear-case downside | -78.1% | 0.0 | 20% | 0.0 |
| Risk / valuation confidence | 60 | 60.0 | 15% | 9.0 |
| Opportunity Score | 41.3 | 100% | 41.3 |
my_watchlist.mdportfolio/holdings.md| Timestamp | Price | Rating | Zone Status | Buy Zone | Strong Buy Zone | Avoid Chasing Above | Base FV | P/W FV | P/W Return | Quality | Opportunity / Rank | Change / Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 (America/New_York) | $173.48 | Avoid | Avoid | >$34.31–$94.94 | ≤ $34.31 | > $131.87 | $105.34 | $118.68 | -31.6% | 88.5 | 35.6 / #52 | Initial missing-file analysis; common-universe ranking; independent scenario assumptions |
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify Delivers Big: 30%+ Growth Across GMV, Revenue, Gross Profit, and Free Cash Flow | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| SHOP complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| SHOP regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| SHOP valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| SHOP historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| SHOP historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| SHOP historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Amazon statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| 2025 10-K — platform, ecosystem and competition | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | FY2025; checked 2026-10-28 | Commerce-platform and channel distinctions; partner relationships |
| SEC XBRL company facts — SHOP | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2026, through 2026-09-30 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
| Issuer SBC/FCF interim disclosure — SHOP | Issuer earnings exhibit / 10-Q | Current FY quarter/YTD through 2026-11-07 | Issuer-reported same-period SBC or FCF (including documented cumulative differences) |
This page presents the saved SHOP analysis. Ratings, zones, and opportunity scores shown above are recalculated at its dated reference price using FolioFacts rules; the live Creator Watchlist uses current market prices and can differ. Missing financial data is not estimated.
This publication reflects my personal investment research, thoughts, and opinions only. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Any ratings or views expressed are general analytical opinions, not recommendations tailored to any reader or offers or solicitations to buy or sell any security or financial instrument.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. This content does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. All investments involve substantial risk, including the potential loss of all principal capital. Past performance is never indicative of future results.
While I endeavor to provide accurate information, all data and analysis are provided "as is" without any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. You must conduct your own independent due diligence and/or consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. I may hold long or short positions in any of the securities or assets discussed herein at any time without notice.
Quality is price independent. Opportunity combines that quality with scenario-based upside, bear-case protection, and confidence. Ownership and cost basis do not affect these scores. Watchlist rank compares the scored companies in that Watchlist.
Model scores, valuation estimates, and price zones are based on assumptions, not guarantees of future performance or individualized advice. Read our Disclaimer.
25% business durability
25% moat and competitive position
20% growth runway
15% financial quality
15% management and capital allocation
30% Quality Score
35% normalized probability-weighted upside
20% normalized bear-case return
15% risk and valuation confidence
At least 50% upside to P/W fair value, with price no more than 10% above bear-case fair value.
At least 25% upside to P/W fair value, above the Strong Buy boundary.
Modeled return from approximately −10% to below +25%.
More than 10% downside to P/W fair value.
Risk-adjusted view. This framework balances expected upside, downside risk and valuation confidence. Zones may be less reliable for companies priced mainly on future potential rather than current fundamentals.
These prompt a review of the research and Opportunity Score. Watchlist ranks are calculated automatically from the scores currently displayed.