Your portfolio starts here.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company research on Owlet, Inc. (OWLT), including the business, investment thesis, risks, and valuation.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company exposure across accounts and funds
Share of portfolio value by account
Signals that deserve a closer look
All accounts · September reference prices
| Company | Portfolio weight | Average cost / share | Current price | Return on cost | Research zone |
|---|
Only the designated FolioFacts administrator should sign in. Public user accounts are not available.
Continue with Google →Showing holdings in selected accounts.
Enter a holding and its account details.
Start with an existing export, or use our template.
Only the holdings you confirm are saved.
| Company | Account | Weight | Return | Shares | Cost basis | Value | Price date | Actions |
|---|
Delete your saved portfolio to remove its positions from this site’s active storage.
Ratings, opportunity scores, and fair values are independent research opinions based on stated assumptions—not personalized investment recommendations. Read our Disclaimer.
Search the US ticker directory by company or symbol. Tickers not found require your confirmation before adding.
| Watchlist rank | Company | Research tier | Zone | Price used | Quality | Model opportunity | Return to fair value | Fair value | Actions |
|---|
Watchlist ranks compare displayed Opportunity Scores across the full list. Filters keep those ranks; equal scores share a rank. Opportunity Scores remain research-model snapshots.
Explore full company reports, business fundamentals, and valuation analysis. Search by name, ticker, or tracking tier.
Price snapshot: 2026-11-03 · Research: 2026-10-21 · Saved analysis, not live market data
Ratings and fair values are independent, dated research opinions—not personalized investment advice. Disclaimer
The reference price is below the probability-weighted fair value.
Dashed marker: reference price $4.23. Scenario values are present fair values, not dated price targets.
3Y revenue CAGR 2%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.02 after compensation; 12× P/E; 18% discount rate; Weak unit economics and dilution leave 2029 economic EPS at $0.02.
Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible3Y revenue CAGR 20%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.40 after compensation; 22× P/E; 18% discount rate; Recurring services and scale produce $0.40 of 2029 economic EPS.
Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress3Y revenue CAGR 32%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.90 after compensation; 28× P/E; 18% discount rate; Strong device adoption and subscription economics produce $0.90 of 2029 economic EPS.
Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assuredFolioFacts zones calculated from the saved fair and bear values at the dated reference price. Live zones can change with research.
A differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. The latest quarter showed operating progress, but a tariff refund materially boosted reported margins and adjusted EBITDA. The thesis requires growth and profitability after removing that one-time benefit. Small scale, historical losses and dilution keep the equity speculative.
Reported FY totals, current FY quarters and cumulative YTD are grouped separately.
Scale within group: $120M
Scale within group: $34M
Scale within group: $58M
Completed FY, standalone current-year quarters and cumulative YTD. No TTM figures.
Each row covers a completed fiscal year. Scale within this group: $12M.
Each row covers an independent quarter; derived cash flow is labeled. Scale within this group: $5.2M.
YTD totals overlap the quarters above and must not be added to them. Scale within this group: $6.8M.
Each annual, quarter and YTD group uses a separate scale. SBC / FCF is a same-period comparison, not a literal employee cash payment. N/M means FCF is zero or negative (or SBC is negative); missing is not zero. Issuer FCF definitions may vary.
Only completed fiscal years and currently open fiscal-year quarters/YTD appear in charts. Standalone quarters and cumulative YTD are separate; missing is never zero. Legacy TTM rows remain in archival source text. The full financial profile below preserves definitions, accounting caveats, and period-end balance details.
This score uses the saved price and research fundamentals. Creator Watchlist calculates the current score and rank using verified market prices.
Watch the evidence behind the thesis, not just the ticker.
Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 20% annual growth on a comparable basis
Growth remains below the 2% bear assumption over a full operating cycle
Affects: Revenue outlook and scenario probabilitiesAfter-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 6.5%
Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable
Affects: Margins, moat score and valuation multipleFinancing and compensation remain consistent with 31.9M economic shares in the 2029 base case
Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings
Affects: Financial score, confidence and downside valueA differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. The latest quarter showed operating progress, but a tariff refund materially boosted reported margins and adjusted EBITDA. The thesis requires growth and profitability after removing that one-time benefit. Small scale, historical losses and dilution keep the equity speculative.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Device demand and subscription retention | A differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. |
| Underlying margins excluding tariff refunds | Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value. |
| Cash runway, financing and dilution | Management maintained 2026 revenue guidance at $118–122 million. |
Owlet sells infant-monitoring devices, including Dream Sock and camera products, and associated subscriptions. Hardware sales depend on new-parent demand, retailer distribution, brand trust and product replacement cycles. Software and subscriptions can increase recurring revenue, but the installed base and attachment rate must support retention. Regulatory authorization and product claims are important to customer trust and commercialization.
Owlet sells infant-monitoring devices, including Dream Sock and camera products, and associated subscriptions. Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value.
The relevant opportunity is the population of families willing and able to buy premium connected monitoring, not all births at the same average selling price. Retail promotions, competing devices and privacy concerns shape adoption. Medical authorization does not guarantee reimbursement or eliminate competition from consumer products.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanit (private) | Direct segment: connected infant cameras and sleep subscriptions | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for new-parent device spending | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Other consumer baby monitors | Substitute: video, audio and non-medical movement monitoring | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for household monitoring budgets | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Medical authorization does not guarantee reimbursement or eliminate competition from consumer products. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Infant cameras, sleep analytics and medically authorized physiological monitoring are different offerings. Danaher and ClearPoint are excluded: broad medtech exposure is not a substitute for Owlet’s consumer infant products.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanit (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: connected infant cameras and sleep subscriptions | Camera/sleep-monitoring subscription proposition | Camera/wrap features are not equivalent to authorized pulse oximetry | Competes for new-parent device spending |
| Other consumer baby monitors | No consistent comparable series | Substitute: video, audio and non-medical movement monitoring | Lower-cost familiar monitoring options | Do not assume equivalent medical authorization or physiological measurements | Competes for household monitoring budgets |
Brand recognition, product integration and regulatory work offer modest advantages. Nanit and other private brands remain relevant direct competitors. The moat is still developing and is vulnerable to reliability issues or product substitution.
Moat direction: Stable — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Brand recognition, product integration and regulatory work offer modest advantages. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2026. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 78.06 | 44.52% | 50.36% | -23.51% | -11.24 | -14.41% | 8.63 | 11 | 20.25 | 11.87 |
| FY2025 | 105.71 | 35.43% | 50.64% | -7.81% | -11.07 | -10.47% | 9.35 | 18 | 35.46 | 13.12 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $22.456 | N/D | 54.5% | -24.5% | −$5.064 (derived: CFO - capex) | -22.6% | $3.49 | 27.565 | $35.459 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $33.865 | N/D | 64.4% | 5.1% | −$0.631 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | -1.9% | $3.233 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 28.514 | $30.948 | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $56.321 | N/D | 60.5% | -6.5% | −$5.695 (derived: CFO - capex) | -10.1% | $6.723 | 28.077 | $30.948 | N/D |
Management maintained 2026 revenue guidance at $118–122 million. The increase in EBITDA guidance reflected a $3.75 million tariff-refund benefit, while underlying expectations were essentially unchanged. TTM FCF remained negative and shares increased substantially. The model uses future fully diluted common-holder earnings after ongoing compensation and financing costs.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $4.23 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $125.07M |
| Enterprise Value | $111.18M |
| Trailing P/E | n/a |
| Provider forward P/E | n/a |
| EV / Sales | 0.97 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OWLT — Owlet, Inc. | Subject company | Public | n/a | 0.97 | infant monitoring devices; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 20.73%; operating margin -7.05% |
| Nanit | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Private | N/A | N/A | connected infant cameras and subscription services; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
| Other consumer baby monitors | Substitute: video, audio and non-medical movement monitoring | Operating alternative / no standalone security | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for household monitoring budgets |
Comparable takeaway: Infant cameras, sleep analytics and medically authorized physiological monitoring are different offerings. Danaher and ClearPoint are excluded: broad medtech exposure is not a substitute for Owlet’s consumer infant products. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 2%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.02 after compensation; 12× P/E; 18% discount rate; Weak unit economics and dilution leave 2029 economic EPS at $0.02. | $0.15 | 35% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -96.5% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 20%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.40 after compensation; 22× P/E; 18% discount rate; Recurring services and scale produce $0.40 of 2029 economic EPS. | $5.36 | 45% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | +26.7% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 32%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.90 after compensation; 28× P/E; 18% discount rate; Strong device adoption and subscription economics produce $0.90 of 2029 economic EPS. | $15.34 | 20% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +262.6% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $5.53 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | +30.7% |
Management has improved distribution and recurring offerings. Capital discipline, transparent adjustment of one-time benefits and protection against financing dilution are essential. Monitor cash runway and underlying profitability rather than headline adjusted EBITDA alone.
Monitor cash runway and underlying profitability rather than headline adjusted EBITDA alone.
Analyzed call: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A · Research snapshot: 2026-10-21
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Shelanski / TD Cowen | How are device sell-through and subscription attachment developing? | Management said seasonality complicates comparisons and subscription attachment is improving. | Follow cohorts beyond initial sign-up. |
| Steve Littman / William Blair | What are the plans for telehealth services and international expansion? | Management said tiered services are planned and European operations are expanding. | New services must improve retention economically. |
| Owen Rickert / Northland | What is on the AI roadmap, and how will distribution support it? | Management said contextual features and retail bundles are planned. | Separate product promise from realized recurring profit. |
| Ben Hayner / Lake Street | How do country launches and WebPay affect the outlook and fees? | Management said rollout is broadening and fees decline as payment mix changes. | Margin benefits require customer migration, not instant repricing. |
| Erlim Kanatkaza / Freedom Brokers | How does upfront enrollment affect subscription economics? | Management said better conversion and margins are expected gradually. | Track subscription contribution after support costs. |
Attachment and direct subscription payment can improve lifetime economics, but the average subscriber life remains limited. Telehealth and AI create options whose recurring profit is still unproven.
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owlet Baby Care Inc. - Owlet Announces Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| OWLT complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| OWLT regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| OWLT valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| OWLT historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| OWLT historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| OWLT historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| 2024 10-K — Nanit and consumer-monitoring alternatives | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | FY2024; historical baseline; checked 2026-10-28 | Nanit product distinction; does not establish current equivalence of regulatory claims |
| Nanit infant camera, sleep and breathing features | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current product page; checked 2026-10-28 | Consumer monitoring alternative; product claims are vendor-presented rather than evidence of medical equivalence |
| SEC XBRL company facts — OWLT | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2026, through 2026-06-30 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
Company: Owlet, Inc.
Ticker: OWLT
Exchange: NYSE
Sector / Industry: Health Care / infant monitoring devices
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $4.23 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2025, FY 2024; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Company: Owlet, Inc.
Ticker: OWLT
Exchange: NYSE
Sector / Industry: Health Care / infant monitoring devices
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $4.23 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2025, FY 2024; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Current Review: 2026-10-28
Previous Review: 2026-10-21
Update Trigger: Competitor relevance and analyst-Q&A correction
| Area | Previous View | Current View | Investment Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition | Preceding operating and comparable-company classifications | Product/customer/geographic boundaries corrected; direct rivals separated from substitutes, partners and valuation anchors | Corrects the competitive comparison; does not by itself re-underwrite the valuation |
| Analyst questions | Prior source-linked Q&A summaries | Complete questions and sentence-form management answers; all 5 existing rows retained | Improves readability while preserving the recorded exchange meaning |
| Valuation and scores | Approved operating/price snapshots, scenarios, scores and decisions | Preserved | No price refresh, rerank or change to valuation assumptions in this correction pass |
Thesis: No new fundamental thesis determination is made in this correction pass. The prior investment decision is preserved; the corrected competitive scope should govern the next substantive review.
| Metric | Current View |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $4.23 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Rating / Zone Status | Buy |
| Bear / Base / Bull Fair Value | $0.15 / $5.36 / $15.34 |
| Scenario Probabilities | 35% / 45% / 20% |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | $5.53 |
| Probability-Weighted Expected Return | +30.7% |
| Bear-Case Return | -96.5% |
| Strong Buy Zone | ≤ $0.17 |
| Buy Zone | >$0.17–$4.42 |
| Avoid Chasing Above | > $6.14 |
| Quality Score / Tier | 53.2 / Tier C |
| Opportunity Score / Rank | 55.5 / #35 of 76 |
| Risk Level | High |
| Tracking / Ownership | Primary Watchlist / Owned |
Decision rationale: OWLT is Buy at $4.28, with +29.2% probability-weighted upside and -96.5% bear-case return. A differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. Confidence is 30/100 because the earnings conversion, competitive and capital assumptions below remain conditional.
A differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. The latest quarter showed operating progress, but a tariff refund materially boosted reported margins and adjusted EBITDA. The thesis requires growth and profitability after removing that one-time benefit. Small scale, historical losses and dilution keep the equity speculative.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Device demand and subscription retention | A differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. |
| Underlying margins excluding tariff refunds | Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value. |
| Cash runway, financing and dilution | Management maintained 2026 revenue guidance at $118–122 million. |
Owlet sells infant-monitoring devices, including Dream Sock and camera products, and associated subscriptions. Hardware sales depend on new-parent demand, retailer distribution, brand trust and product replacement cycles. Software and subscriptions can increase recurring revenue, but the installed base and attachment rate must support retention. Regulatory authorization and product claims are important to customer trust and commercialization.
Owlet sells infant-monitoring devices, including Dream Sock and camera products, and associated subscriptions. Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value.
The relevant opportunity is the population of families willing and able to buy premium connected monitoring, not all births at the same average selling price. Retail promotions, competing devices and privacy concerns shape adoption. Medical authorization does not guarantee reimbursement or eliminate competition from consumer products.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanit (private) | Direct segment: connected infant cameras and sleep subscriptions | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for new-parent device spending | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Other consumer baby monitors | Substitute: video, audio and non-medical movement monitoring | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for household monitoring budgets | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Medical authorization does not guarantee reimbursement or eliminate competition from consumer products. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value. Product reliability and support are critical. A large installed base creates value only if customers remain engaged and subscriptions produce incremental profit. Management reported about 30% first-year subscription attachment and an average subscriber life near 12 months. WebPay can reduce app-store fees, but the installed subscriber mix changes gradually. These are more useful than assuming a permanent subscription from every device sale.
The economic test is Cash runway, financing and dilution. These are more useful than assuming a permanent subscription from every device sale.
Infant cameras, sleep analytics and medically authorized physiological monitoring are different offerings. Danaher and ClearPoint are excluded: broad medtech exposure is not a substitute for Owlet’s consumer infant products.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanit (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: connected infant cameras and sleep subscriptions | Camera/sleep-monitoring subscription proposition | Camera/wrap features are not equivalent to authorized pulse oximetry | Competes for new-parent device spending |
| Other consumer baby monitors | No consistent comparable series | Substitute: video, audio and non-medical movement monitoring | Lower-cost familiar monitoring options | Do not assume equivalent medical authorization or physiological measurements | Competes for household monitoring budgets |
Brand recognition, product integration and regulatory work offer modest advantages. Nanit and other private brands remain relevant direct competitors. The moat is still developing and is vulnerable to reliability issues or product substitution.
Moat direction: Stable — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Brand recognition, product integration and regulatory work offer modest advantages. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2026. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 78.06 | 44.52% | 50.36% | -23.51% | -11.24 | -14.41% | 8.63 | 11 | 20.25 | 11.87 |
| FY2025 | 105.71 | 35.43% | 50.64% | -7.81% | -11.07 | -10.47% | 9.35 | 18 | 35.46 | 13.12 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $22.456 | N/D | 54.5% | -24.5% | −$5.064 (derived: CFO - capex) | -22.6% | $3.49 | 27.565 | $35.459 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $33.865 | N/D | 64.4% | 5.1% | −$0.631 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | -1.9% | $3.233 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 28.514 | $30.948 | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $56.321 | N/D | 60.5% | -6.5% | −$5.695 (derived: CFO - capex) | -10.1% | $6.723 | 28.077 | $30.948 | N/D |
Management maintained 2026 revenue guidance at $118–122 million. The increase in EBITDA guidance reflected a $3.75 million tariff-refund benefit, while underlying expectations were essentially unchanged. TTM FCF remained negative and shares increased substantially. The model uses future fully diluted common-holder earnings after ongoing compensation and financing costs.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
Management has improved distribution and recurring offerings. Capital discipline, transparent adjustment of one-time benefits and protection against financing dilution are essential. Monitor cash runway and underlying profitability rather than headline adjusted EBITDA alone.
Monitor cash runway and underlying profitability rather than headline adjusted EBITDA alone.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $4.23 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $125.07M |
| Enterprise Value | $111.18M |
| Trailing P/E | n/a |
| Provider forward P/E | n/a |
| EV / Sales | 0.97 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OWLT — Owlet, Inc. | Subject company | Public | n/a | 0.97 | infant monitoring devices; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 20.73%; operating margin -7.05% |
| Nanit | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Private | N/A | N/A | connected infant cameras and subscription services; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
| Other consumer baby monitors | Substitute: video, audio and non-medical movement monitoring | Operating alternative / no standalone security | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for household monitoring budgets |
Comparable takeaway: Infant cameras, sleep analytics and medically authorized physiological monitoring are different offerings. Danaher and ClearPoint are excluded: broad medtech exposure is not a substitute for Owlet’s consumer infant products. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 2%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.02 after compensation; 12× P/E; 18% discount rate; Weak unit economics and dilution leave 2029 economic EPS at $0.02. | $0.15 | 35% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -96.5% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 20%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.40 after compensation; 22× P/E; 18% discount rate; Recurring services and scale produce $0.40 of 2029 economic EPS. | $5.36 | 45% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | +26.7% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 32%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.90 after compensation; 28× P/E; 18% discount rate; Strong device adoption and subscription economics produce $0.90 of 2029 economic EPS. | $15.34 | 20% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +262.6% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $5.53 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | +30.7% |
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Shelanski / TD Cowen | How are device sell-through and subscription attachment developing? | Management said seasonality complicates comparisons and subscription attachment is improving. | Follow cohorts beyond initial sign-up. |
| Steve Littman / William Blair | What are the plans for telehealth services and international expansion? | Management said tiered services are planned and European operations are expanding. | New services must improve retention economically. |
| Owen Rickert / Northland | What is on the AI roadmap, and how will distribution support it? | Management said contextual features and retail bundles are planned. | Separate product promise from realized recurring profit. |
| Ben Hayner / Lake Street | How do country launches and WebPay affect the outlook and fees? | Management said rollout is broadening and fees decline as payment mix changes. | Margin benefits require customer migration, not instant repricing. |
| Erlim Kanatkaza / Freedom Brokers | How does upfront enrollment affect subscription economics? | Management said better conversion and margins are expected gradually. | Track subscription contribution after support costs. |
Attachment and direct subscription payment can improve lifetime economics, but the average subscriber life remains limited. Telehealth and AI create options whose recurring profit is still unproven.
| Driver | Current State | Positive Trigger / Catalyst | Negative Trigger / Falsifier | What It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device demand and subscription retention | A differentiated device brand and expanding subscriptions can improve gross profit and recurring economics. | Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 20% annual growth on a comparable basis | Growth remains below the 2% bear assumption over a full operating cycle | Revenue outlook and scenario probabilities |
| Underlying margins excluding tariff refunds | Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value. | After-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 6.5% | Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable | Margins, moat score and valuation multiple |
| Cash runway, financing and dilution | Management maintained 2026 revenue guidance at $118–122 million. | Financing and compensation remain consistent with 31.9M economic shares in the 2029 base case | Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings | Financial score, confidence and downside value |
| Component | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business durability and economics | 48 | 25% | 12.0 | Device contribution after returns, retail margin and acquisition spending, plus subscription attachment and retention, determine lifetime value. |
| Moat and competitive position | 52 | 25% | 13.0 | Brand recognition, product integration and regulatory work offer modest advantages. |
| Growth runway and durability | 78 | 20% | 15.6 | The relevant opportunity is the population of families willing and able to buy premium connected monitoring, not all births at the same average selling price. |
| Financial quality and balance sheet | 35 | 15% | 5.3 | Management maintained 2026 revenue guidance at $118–122 million. |
| Management, governance and capital allocation | 49 | 15% | 7.4 | Management has improved distribution and recurring offerings. |
| Quality Score | 53.2 | 100% | 53.2 | Weighted score, independent of ownership and current price |
| Component | Raw Input | Normalized Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 53.2 | 53.2 | 30% | 16.0 |
| Probability-weighted upside | +30.7% | 100.0 | 35% | 35.0 |
| Bear-case downside | -96.5% | 0.0 | 20% | 0.0 |
| Risk / valuation confidence | 30 | 30.0 | 15% | 4.5 |
| Opportunity Score | 55.5 | 100% | 55.5 |
my_watchlist.mdportfolio/holdings.md| Timestamp | Price | Rating | Zone Status | Buy Zone | Strong Buy Zone | Avoid Chasing Above | Base FV | P/W FV | P/W Return | Quality | Opportunity / Rank | Change / Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 (America/New_York) | $4.28 | Buy | Buy | >$0.17–$4.42 | ≤ $0.17 | > $6.14 | $5.36 | $5.53 | +29.2% | 53.2 | 55.5 / #29 | Initial missing-file analysis; common-universe ranking; independent scenario assumptions |
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owlet Baby Care Inc. - Owlet Announces Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| OWLT complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| OWLT regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| OWLT valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| OWLT historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| OWLT historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| OWLT historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| 2024 10-K — Nanit and consumer-monitoring alternatives | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | FY2024; historical baseline; checked 2026-10-28 | Nanit product distinction; does not establish current equivalence of regulatory claims |
| Nanit infant camera, sleep and breathing features | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current product page; checked 2026-10-28 | Consumer monitoring alternative; product claims are vendor-presented rather than evidence of medical equivalence |
| SEC XBRL company facts — OWLT | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2026, through 2026-06-30 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
This page presents the saved OWLT analysis. Ratings, zones, and opportunity scores shown above are recalculated at its dated reference price using FolioFacts rules; the live Creator Watchlist uses current market prices and can differ. Missing financial data is not estimated.
This publication reflects my personal investment research, thoughts, and opinions only. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Any ratings or views expressed are general analytical opinions, not recommendations tailored to any reader or offers or solicitations to buy or sell any security or financial instrument.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. This content does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. All investments involve substantial risk, including the potential loss of all principal capital. Past performance is never indicative of future results.
While I endeavor to provide accurate information, all data and analysis are provided "as is" without any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. You must conduct your own independent due diligence and/or consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. I may hold long or short positions in any of the securities or assets discussed herein at any time without notice.
Quality is price independent. Opportunity combines that quality with scenario-based upside, bear-case protection, and confidence. Ownership and cost basis do not affect these scores. Watchlist rank compares the scored companies in that Watchlist.
Model scores, valuation estimates, and price zones are based on assumptions, not guarantees of future performance or individualized advice. Read our Disclaimer.
25% business durability
25% moat and competitive position
20% growth runway
15% financial quality
15% management and capital allocation
30% Quality Score
35% normalized probability-weighted upside
20% normalized bear-case return
15% risk and valuation confidence
At least 50% upside to P/W fair value, with price no more than 10% above bear-case fair value.
At least 25% upside to P/W fair value, above the Strong Buy boundary.
Modeled return from approximately −10% to below +25%.
More than 10% downside to P/W fair value.
Risk-adjusted view. This framework balances expected upside, downside risk and valuation confidence. Zones may be less reliable for companies priced mainly on future potential rather than current fundamentals.
These prompt a review of the research and Opportunity Score. Watchlist ranks are calculated automatically from the scores currently displayed.