Your portfolio starts here.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company research on Medtronic plc (MDT), including the business, investment thesis, risks, and valuation.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company exposure across accounts and funds
Share of portfolio value by account
Signals that deserve a closer look
All accounts · September reference prices
| Company | Portfolio weight | Average cost / share | Current price | Return on cost | Research zone |
|---|
Only the designated FolioFacts administrator should sign in. Public user accounts are not available.
Continue with Google →Showing holdings in selected accounts.
Enter a holding and its account details.
Start with an existing export, or use our template.
Only the holdings you confirm are saved.
| Company | Account | Weight | Return | Shares | Cost basis | Value | Price date | Actions |
|---|
Delete your saved portfolio to remove its positions from this site’s active storage.
Ratings, opportunity scores, and fair values are independent research opinions based on stated assumptions—not personalized investment recommendations. Read our Disclaimer.
Search the US ticker directory by company or symbol. Tickers not found require your confirmation before adding.
| Watchlist rank | Company | Research tier | Zone | Price used | Quality | Model opportunity | Return to fair value | Fair value | Actions |
|---|
Watchlist ranks compare displayed Opportunity Scores across the full list. Filters keep those ranks; equal scores share a rank. Opportunity Scores remain research-model snapshots.
Explore full company reports, business fundamentals, and valuation analysis. Search by name, ticker, or tracking tier.
Price snapshot: 2026-11-03 · Research: 2026-10-21 · Saved analysis, not live market data
Ratings and fair values are independent, dated research opinions—not personalized investment advice. Disclaimer
The reference price is above the probability-weighted fair value.
Dashed marker: reference price $98.88. Scenario values are present fair values, not dated price targets.
3Y revenue CAGR 2%; sustainable 2029 EPS $5.00 after compensation; 13× P/E; 11% discount rate; Growth returns to low single digits and 2029 sustainable EPS is $5.
Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible3Y revenue CAGR 6%; sustainable 2029 EPS $6.80 after compensation; 18× P/E; 11% discount rate; Steady product execution produces $6.80 of 2029 sustainable EPS.
Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress3Y revenue CAGR 9%; sustainable 2029 EPS $8.50 after compensation; 22× P/E; 11% discount rate; A stronger portfolio cycle produces $8.50 of 2029 sustainable EPS.
Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assuredFolioFacts zones calculated from the saved fair and bear values at the dated reference price. Live zones can change with research.
A durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. Q1 FY27 revenue grew 13.7% organically and management raised full-year guidance. The key issue is how much acceleration persists after comparisons normalize and whether innovation translates into better group growth and returns on capital. The stock deserves a durable-device valuation, not a speculative technology multiple.
Reported FY totals, current FY quarters and cumulative YTD are grouped separately.
Scale within group: $38B
Scale within group: $9.8B
Completed FY, standalone current-year quarters and cumulative YTD. No TTM figures.
Each row covers a completed fiscal year. Scale within this group: $5.6B.
Each row covers an independent quarter; derived cash flow is labeled. Scale within this group: $1.4B.
Each annual, quarter and YTD group uses a separate scale. SBC / FCF is a same-period comparison, not a literal employee cash payment. N/M means FCF is zero or negative (or SBC is negative); missing is not zero. Issuer FCF definitions may vary.
Only completed fiscal years and currently open fiscal-year quarters/YTD appear in charts. Standalone quarters and cumulative YTD are separate; missing is never zero. Legacy TTM rows remain in archival source text. The full financial profile below preserves definitions, accounting caveats, and period-end balance details.
This score uses the saved price and research fundamentals. Creator Watchlist calculates the current score and rank using verified market prices.
Watch the evidence behind the thesis, not just the ticker.
Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 6% annual growth on a comparable basis
Growth remains below the 2% bear assumption over a full operating cycle
Affects: Revenue outlook and scenario probabilitiesAfter-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 19.0%
Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable
Affects: Margins, moat score and valuation multipleFinancing and compensation remain consistent with 1,144.1M economic shares in the 2029 base case
Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings
Affects: Financial score, confidence and downside valueA durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. Q1 FY27 revenue grew 13.7% organically and management raised full-year guidance. The key issue is how much acceleration persists after comparisons normalize and whether innovation translates into better group growth and returns on capital. The stock deserves a durable-device valuation, not a speculative technology multiple.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Durability of organic growth acceleration | A durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. |
| Clinical launches, quality and reimbursement | Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics. |
| FCF, dividend coverage and capital allocation | Q1 FY27 revenue was $9.756 billion and adjusted EPS $1.45; FY27 adjusted EPS guidance was $5.94–6.00. |
Medtronic sells devices across cardiovascular, neuroscience, medical-surgical and diabetes care. Revenue combines implanted devices, procedure-linked products, capital equipment and recurring consumables. Hospitals, physicians and patients adopt products based on clinical outcomes, training, reimbursement and reliability. Diversification reduces dependence on a single product but also makes group growth slower and harder to change through one successful launch. MiniMed became fully independent on October 15, 2026. Diabetes is therefore excluded from the forward Medtronic business perimeter; the historical statements and September earnings guidance still included it. Cardiovascular, Neuroscience and Surgical are the continuing focus.
Medtronic sells devices across cardiovascular, neuroscience, medical-surgical and diabetes care. Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics.
Aging populations, chronic disease and minimally invasive procedures support demand. Competition is intense in cardiac, surgical and diabetes technologies. Regulatory approval and reimbursement constrain the pace at which large patient populations become profitable served markets.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Scientific (BSX) | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and neuromodulation | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for physician adoption | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Abbott (ABT) | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and structural heart | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competition must be evaluated by device | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Johnson & Johnson | Direct segments: EP, surgical and selected neuroscience products | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes in selected procedure categories | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Regulatory approval and reimbursement constrain the pace at which large patient populations become profitable served markets. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Use the remaining cardiovascular, neuroscience and surgical portfolio. Historical Medtronic diabetes competition must be attributed to independent MiniMed after separation; diversified device exposure alone does not establish full comparability.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Scientific (BSX) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and neuromodulation | Focused cardiovascular procedure franchises | Different mix outside overlapping devices | Competes for physician adoption |
| Abbott (ABT) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and structural heart | Established cardiovascular products and clinical relationships | Diagnostics/nutrition do not overlap Medtronic devices | Competition must be evaluated by device |
| Johnson & Johnson | No consistent comparable series | Direct segments: EP, surgical and selected neuroscience products | Clinical and hospital distribution | Diversified pharmaceuticals are outside the device comparison | Competes in selected procedure categories |
Clinical evidence, regulatory expertise, global distribution and installed systems create a strong diversified moat. Certain franchises face faster innovators, so the portfolio should be evaluated by product rather than assuming uniform leadership.
Moat direction: Stable — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Clinical evidence, regulatory expertise, global distribution and installed systems create a strong diversified moat. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2027. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 33,537 | 3.62% | 65.39% | 18.89% | 5,185 | 15.46% | 429 | 1,290 | 8,965 | 29,626 |
| FY2026 | 36,364 | 8.43% | 65.31% | 19.98% | 5,426 | 14.92% | 457 | 1,288 | 9,220 | 29,149 |
| Q1 FY2027 | $9,756 | N/D | N/D | 18.1% | $1,290 (derived: CFO - capex) | 13.2% | $125 | 1,285.1 | $1,691 | N/D |
Q1 FY27 revenue was $9.756 billion and adjusted EPS $1.45; FY27 adjusted EPS guidance was $5.94–6.00. TTM FCF of $6.13 billion supports dividends, debt service and reinvestment. The model uses sustainable EPS after ongoing costs, with a lower multiple than faster-growing medtech peers. The October split exchanged the entire 252.8 million-share MiniMed holding for 55.0 million Medtronic shares. Do not add a retained MiniMed investment or dividend to the model. The 2029 EPS assumptions refer to continuing Medtronic after the smaller share base; previously issued full-company FY27 guidance is not a post-separation forecast.
The historical table predates the October MiniMed split. Forward valuation excludes Diabetes and the former MiniMed stake and incorporates cancellation of 55.0 million Medtronic shares. The earnings release’s $5.94–6.00 FY27 EPS guide is historical full-company guidance, not a verified continuing-company update.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $98.88 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $115.84B |
| Enterprise Value | $135.01B |
| Trailing P/E | 23.31 |
| Provider forward P/E | 15.76 |
| EV / Sales | 3.60 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDT — Medtronic plc | Subject company | Public | 15.76 | 3.60 | diversified medical devices; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 5.20%; operating margin 20.10% |
| BSX — Boston Scientific Corporation | Direct overlapping cardiovascular/neuro segments | Public | 14.14 | 3.72 | medical devices; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 5.49%; operating margin 20.47% |
| ABT — Abbott | Direct cardiovascular segments; broader group multiple | Public | 17.68 | 4.39 | diagnostics, cardiovascular devices and diabetes monitoring; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 9.53%; operating margin 17.68% |
| Johnson & Johnson | Direct segments: EP, surgical and selected neuroscience products | Operating product / listed parent | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes in selected procedure categories |
Comparable takeaway: Use the remaining cardiovascular, neuroscience and surgical portfolio. Historical Medtronic diabetes competition must be attributed to independent MiniMed after separation; diversified device exposure alone does not establish full comparability. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 18×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 15.76×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $78.36, versus the central base FV of $89.50. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 2%; sustainable 2029 EPS $5.00 after compensation; 13× P/E; 11% discount rate; Growth returns to low single digits and 2029 sustainable EPS is $5. | $47.53 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -51.9% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 6%; sustainable 2029 EPS $6.80 after compensation; 18× P/E; 11% discount rate; Steady product execution produces $6.80 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $89.50 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | -9.5% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 9%; sustainable 2029 EPS $8.50 after compensation; 22× P/E; 11% discount rate; A stronger portfolio cycle produces $8.50 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $136.73 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +38.3% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $90.82 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | -8.2% |
Management's improved execution and pipeline progress are encouraging. Portfolio simplification, acquisitions and capital returns should improve per-share economics without starving innovation. Monitor whether faster growth survives the next comparison cycle and whether debt and dividends remain comfortably funded.
Monitor whether faster growth survives the next comparison cycle and whether debt and dividends remain comfortably funded.
Analyzed call: Q1 FY2027, complete material Q&A · Research snapshot: 2026-10-21
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Steed / Bank of America | What supports core growth and margin guidance? | Management said the broad portfolio supports guidance. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Larry Biegelsen / Wells Fargo | What synergies are expected from the Cornerstone acquisition? | Management said distribution synergies should develop over time. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Vijay Kumar / Evercore | How does the diabetes separation change the business? | Management said the transaction changes the reporting and operating perimeter. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Mike Kratky / Leerink | How is Affera adoption supporting the cardiac opportunity? | Management said sequential adoption supports the opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Anthony Petrone / Mizuho | How will capital be allocated after the diabetes separation? | Management said the remaining portfolio must replace the separated growth contribution. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Matt O'Brien / Piper Sandler | What will drive renal-denervation adoption? | Management said clinical evidence and reimbursement drive adoption. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Robbie Marcus / JPMorgan | What is the expected margin trajectory for the year? | Management said it is targeting full-year margin improvement. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
Cardiac adoption and margin execution support continuing operations. The now-completed Diabetes separation changes comparability and capital allocation; historical full-company guidance is an inadequate standalone forecast.
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic reports first quarter fiscal 2027 results; delivers broad-based portfolio performance and raises fiscal 2027 guidance - Sep 1, 2026 | Company IR / earnings filing | Q1 FY2027 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| MDT complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q1 FY2027 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| MDT regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| MDT valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| MDT historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| MDT historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| MDT historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Boston Scientific Corporation statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| Abbott statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| MiniMed separation completion | Company IR | 2026-10-15 | Continuing business perimeter |
| Final split-off results | Company IR | 2026-10-14 | 55.0 million Medtronic shares exchanged; no retained MiniMed stake |
| SEC XBRL company facts — MDT | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2027, through 2026-07-31 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
Company: Medtronic plc
Ticker: MDT
Exchange: NYSE
Sector / Industry: Health Care / diversified medical devices
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $98.88 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q1 FY2027
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2026, FY 2025; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q1 FY2027, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: October 15 separation completion and October 14 exchange results
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Company: Medtronic plc
Ticker: MDT
Exchange: NYSE
Sector / Industry: Health Care / diversified medical devices
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $98.88 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q1 FY2027
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2026, FY 2025; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q1 FY2027, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: October 15 separation completion and October 14 exchange results
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Current Review: 2026-10-28
Previous Review: 2026-10-21
Update Trigger: Competitor relevance and analyst-Q&A correction
| Area | Previous View | Current View | Investment Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition | Preceding operating and comparable-company classifications | Product/customer/geographic boundaries corrected; direct rivals separated from substitutes, partners and valuation anchors | Corrects the competitive comparison; does not by itself re-underwrite the valuation |
| Analyst questions | Prior source-linked Q&A summaries | Complete questions and sentence-form management answers; all 7 existing rows retained | Improves readability while preserving the recorded exchange meaning |
| Valuation and scores | Approved operating/price snapshots, scenarios, scores and decisions | Preserved | No price refresh, rerank or change to valuation assumptions in this correction pass |
Thesis: No new fundamental thesis determination is made in this correction pass. The prior investment decision is preserved; the corrected competitive scope should govern the next substantive review.
| Metric | Current View |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $98.88 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Rating / Zone Status | Hold / Watch |
| Bear / Base / Bull Fair Value | $47.53 / $89.50 / $136.73 |
| Scenario Probabilities | 25% / 50% / 25% |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | $90.82 |
| Probability-Weighted Expected Return | -8.2% |
| Bear-Case Return | -51.9% |
| Strong Buy Zone | ≤ $52.28 |
| Buy Zone | >$52.28–$72.66 |
| Avoid Chasing Above | > $100.91 |
| Quality Score / Tier | 80.4 / Tier A |
| Opportunity Score / Rank | 44.6 / #52 of 76 |
| Risk Level | Medium-High |
| Tracking / Ownership | Primary Watchlist / Owned |
Decision rationale: MDT is Hold / Watch at $94.63, with -4.0% probability-weighted upside and -49.8% bear-case return. A durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. Confidence is 58/100 because the earnings conversion, competitive and capital assumptions below remain conditional.
A durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. Q1 FY27 revenue grew 13.7% organically and management raised full-year guidance. The key issue is how much acceleration persists after comparisons normalize and whether innovation translates into better group growth and returns on capital. The stock deserves a durable-device valuation, not a speculative technology multiple.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Durability of organic growth acceleration | A durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. |
| Clinical launches, quality and reimbursement | Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics. |
| FCF, dividend coverage and capital allocation | Q1 FY27 revenue was $9.756 billion and adjusted EPS $1.45; FY27 adjusted EPS guidance was $5.94–6.00. |
Medtronic sells devices across cardiovascular, neuroscience, medical-surgical and diabetes care. Revenue combines implanted devices, procedure-linked products, capital equipment and recurring consumables. Hospitals, physicians and patients adopt products based on clinical outcomes, training, reimbursement and reliability. Diversification reduces dependence on a single product but also makes group growth slower and harder to change through one successful launch. MiniMed became fully independent on October 15, 2026. Diabetes is therefore excluded from the forward Medtronic business perimeter; the historical statements and September earnings guidance still included it. Cardiovascular, Neuroscience and Surgical are the continuing focus.
Medtronic sells devices across cardiovascular, neuroscience, medical-surgical and diabetes care. Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics.
Aging populations, chronic disease and minimally invasive procedures support demand. Competition is intense in cardiac, surgical and diabetes technologies. Regulatory approval and reimbursement constrain the pace at which large patient populations become profitable served markets.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Scientific (BSX) | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and neuromodulation | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for physician adoption | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Abbott (ABT) | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and structural heart | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competition must be evaluated by device | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Johnson & Johnson | Direct segments: EP, surgical and selected neuroscience products | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes in selected procedure categories | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Regulatory approval and reimbursement constrain the pace at which large patient populations become profitable served markets. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics. Physician training and hospital procurement create switching costs. Pricing pressure and manufacturing quality can offset volume growth, making organic revenue and cash margins more informative than adjusted EPS alone.
The economic test is FCF, dividend coverage and capital allocation. Pricing pressure and manufacturing quality can offset volume growth, making organic revenue and cash margins more informative than adjusted EPS alone.
Use the remaining cardiovascular, neuroscience and surgical portfolio. Historical Medtronic diabetes competition must be attributed to independent MiniMed after separation; diversified device exposure alone does not establish full comparability.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Scientific (BSX) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and neuromodulation | Focused cardiovascular procedure franchises | Different mix outside overlapping devices | Competes for physician adoption |
| Abbott (ABT) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segments: cardiac rhythm, EP and structural heart | Established cardiovascular products and clinical relationships | Diagnostics/nutrition do not overlap Medtronic devices | Competition must be evaluated by device |
| Johnson & Johnson | No consistent comparable series | Direct segments: EP, surgical and selected neuroscience products | Clinical and hospital distribution | Diversified pharmaceuticals are outside the device comparison | Competes in selected procedure categories |
Clinical evidence, regulatory expertise, global distribution and installed systems create a strong diversified moat. Certain franchises face faster innovators, so the portfolio should be evaluated by product rather than assuming uniform leadership.
Moat direction: Stable — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Clinical evidence, regulatory expertise, global distribution and installed systems create a strong diversified moat. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2027. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 33,537 | 3.62% | 65.39% | 18.89% | 5,185 | 15.46% | 429 | 1,290 | 8,965 | 29,626 |
| FY2026 | 36,364 | 8.43% | 65.31% | 19.98% | 5,426 | 14.92% | 457 | 1,288 | 9,220 | 29,149 |
| Q1 FY2027 | $9,756 | N/D | N/D | 18.1% | $1,290 (derived: CFO - capex) | 13.2% | $125 | 1,285.1 | $1,691 | N/D |
Q1 FY27 revenue was $9.756 billion and adjusted EPS $1.45; FY27 adjusted EPS guidance was $5.94–6.00. TTM FCF of $6.13 billion supports dividends, debt service and reinvestment. The model uses sustainable EPS after ongoing costs, with a lower multiple than faster-growing medtech peers. The October split exchanged the entire 252.8 million-share MiniMed holding for 55.0 million Medtronic shares. Do not add a retained MiniMed investment or dividend to the model. The 2029 EPS assumptions refer to continuing Medtronic after the smaller share base; previously issued full-company FY27 guidance is not a post-separation forecast.
The historical table predates the October MiniMed split. Forward valuation excludes Diabetes and the former MiniMed stake and incorporates cancellation of 55.0 million Medtronic shares. The earnings release’s $5.94–6.00 FY27 EPS guide is historical full-company guidance, not a verified continuing-company update.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
Management's improved execution and pipeline progress are encouraging. Portfolio simplification, acquisitions and capital returns should improve per-share economics without starving innovation. Monitor whether faster growth survives the next comparison cycle and whether debt and dividends remain comfortably funded.
Monitor whether faster growth survives the next comparison cycle and whether debt and dividends remain comfortably funded.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $98.88 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $115.84B |
| Enterprise Value | $135.01B |
| Trailing P/E | 23.31 |
| Provider forward P/E | 15.76 |
| EV / Sales | 3.60 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDT — Medtronic plc | Subject company | Public | 15.76 | 3.60 | diversified medical devices; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 5.20%; operating margin 20.10% |
| BSX — Boston Scientific Corporation | Direct overlapping cardiovascular/neuro segments | Public | 14.14 | 3.72 | medical devices; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 5.49%; operating margin 20.47% |
| ABT — Abbott | Direct cardiovascular segments; broader group multiple | Public | 17.68 | 4.39 | diagnostics, cardiovascular devices and diabetes monitoring; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 9.53%; operating margin 17.68% |
| Johnson & Johnson | Direct segments: EP, surgical and selected neuroscience products | Operating product / listed parent | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes in selected procedure categories |
Comparable takeaway: Use the remaining cardiovascular, neuroscience and surgical portfolio. Historical Medtronic diabetes competition must be attributed to independent MiniMed after separation; diversified device exposure alone does not establish full comparability. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 18×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 15.76×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $78.36, versus the central base FV of $89.50. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 2%; sustainable 2029 EPS $5.00 after compensation; 13× P/E; 11% discount rate; Growth returns to low single digits and 2029 sustainable EPS is $5. | $47.53 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -51.9% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 6%; sustainable 2029 EPS $6.80 after compensation; 18× P/E; 11% discount rate; Steady product execution produces $6.80 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $89.50 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | -9.5% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 9%; sustainable 2029 EPS $8.50 after compensation; 22× P/E; 11% discount rate; A stronger portfolio cycle produces $8.50 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $136.73 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +38.3% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $90.82 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | -8.2% |
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Steed / Bank of America | What supports core growth and margin guidance? | Management said the broad portfolio supports guidance. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Larry Biegelsen / Wells Fargo | What synergies are expected from the Cornerstone acquisition? | Management said distribution synergies should develop over time. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Vijay Kumar / Evercore | How does the diabetes separation change the business? | Management said the transaction changes the reporting and operating perimeter. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Mike Kratky / Leerink | How is Affera adoption supporting the cardiac opportunity? | Management said sequential adoption supports the opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Anthony Petrone / Mizuho | How will capital be allocated after the diabetes separation? | Management said the remaining portfolio must replace the separated growth contribution. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Matt O'Brien / Piper Sandler | What will drive renal-denervation adoption? | Management said clinical evidence and reimbursement drive adoption. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Robbie Marcus / JPMorgan | What is the expected margin trajectory for the year? | Management said it is targeting full-year margin improvement. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
Cardiac adoption and margin execution support continuing operations. The now-completed Diabetes separation changes comparability and capital allocation; historical full-company guidance is an inadequate standalone forecast.
| Driver | Current State | Positive Trigger / Catalyst | Negative Trigger / Falsifier | What It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durability of organic growth acceleration | A durable installed base, cash generation and improving product cycles can support steady per-share returns. | Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 6% annual growth on a comparable basis | Growth remains below the 2% bear assumption over a full operating cycle | Revenue outlook and scenario probabilities |
| Clinical launches, quality and reimbursement | Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics. | After-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 19.0% | Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable | Margins, moat score and valuation multiple |
| FCF, dividend coverage and capital allocation | Q1 FY27 revenue was $9.756 billion and adjusted EPS $1.45; FY27 adjusted EPS guidance was $5.94–6.00. | Financing and compensation remain consistent with 1,144.1M economic shares in the 2029 base case | Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings | Financial score, confidence and downside value |
| Component | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business durability and economics | 86 | 25% | 21.5 | Procedure volumes, product mix, installed equipment utilization and recurring consumable demand drive customer economics. |
| Moat and competitive position | 85 | 25% | 21.3 | Clinical evidence, regulatory expertise, global distribution and installed systems create a strong diversified moat. |
| Growth runway and durability | 74 | 20% | 14.8 | Aging populations, chronic disease and minimally invasive procedures support demand. |
| Financial quality and balance sheet | 79 | 15% | 11.9 | Q1 FY27 revenue was $9.756 billion and adjusted EPS $1.45; FY27 adjusted EPS guidance was $5.94–6.00. |
| Management, governance and capital allocation | 73 | 15% | 11.0 | Management's improved execution and pipeline progress are encouraging. |
| Quality Score | 80.4 | 100% | 80.4 | Weighted score, independent of ownership and current price |
| Component | Raw Input | Normalized Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 80.4 | 80.4 | 30% | 24.1 |
| Probability-weighted upside | -8.2% | 33.7 | 35% | 11.8 |
| Bear-case downside | -51.9% | 0.0 | 20% | 0.0 |
| Risk / valuation confidence | 58 | 58.0 | 15% | 8.7 |
| Opportunity Score | 44.6 | 100% | 44.6 |
my_watchlist.mdportfolio/holdings.md| Timestamp | Price | Rating | Zone Status | Buy Zone | Strong Buy Zone | Avoid Chasing Above | Base FV | P/W FV | P/W Return | Quality | Opportunity / Rank | Change / Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 (America/New_York) | $94.63 | Hold / Watch | Hold / Watch | >$52.28–$72.66 | ≤ $52.28 | > $100.91 | $89.50 | $90.82 | -4.0% | 80.4 | 47.5 / #39 | Initial missing-file analysis; common-universe ranking; independent scenario assumptions |
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic reports first quarter fiscal 2027 results; delivers broad-based portfolio performance and raises fiscal 2027 guidance - Sep 1, 2026 | Company IR / earnings filing | Q1 FY2027 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| MDT complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q1 FY2027 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| MDT regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| MDT valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| MDT historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| MDT historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| MDT historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Boston Scientific Corporation statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| Abbott statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| MiniMed separation completion | Company IR | 2026-10-15 | Continuing business perimeter |
| Final split-off results | Company IR | 2026-10-14 | 55.0 million Medtronic shares exchanged; no retained MiniMed stake |
| SEC XBRL company facts — MDT | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2027, through 2026-07-31 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
This page presents the saved MDT analysis. Ratings, zones, and opportunity scores shown above are recalculated at its dated reference price using FolioFacts rules; the live Creator Watchlist uses current market prices and can differ. Missing financial data is not estimated.
This publication reflects my personal investment research, thoughts, and opinions only. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Any ratings or views expressed are general analytical opinions, not recommendations tailored to any reader or offers or solicitations to buy or sell any security or financial instrument.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. This content does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. All investments involve substantial risk, including the potential loss of all principal capital. Past performance is never indicative of future results.
While I endeavor to provide accurate information, all data and analysis are provided "as is" without any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. You must conduct your own independent due diligence and/or consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. I may hold long or short positions in any of the securities or assets discussed herein at any time without notice.
Quality is price independent. Opportunity combines that quality with scenario-based upside, bear-case protection, and confidence. Ownership and cost basis do not affect these scores. Watchlist rank compares the scored companies in that Watchlist.
Model scores, valuation estimates, and price zones are based on assumptions, not guarantees of future performance or individualized advice. Read our Disclaimer.
25% business durability
25% moat and competitive position
20% growth runway
15% financial quality
15% management and capital allocation
30% Quality Score
35% normalized probability-weighted upside
20% normalized bear-case return
15% risk and valuation confidence
At least 50% upside to P/W fair value, with price no more than 10% above bear-case fair value.
At least 25% upside to P/W fair value, above the Strong Buy boundary.
Modeled return from approximately −10% to below +25%.
More than 10% downside to P/W fair value.
Risk-adjusted view. This framework balances expected upside, downside risk and valuation confidence. Zones may be less reliable for companies priced mainly on future potential rather than current fundamentals.
These prompt a review of the research and Opportunity Score. Watchlist ranks are calculated automatically from the scores currently displayed.