Your portfolio starts here.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company research on Samsara Inc. (IOT), including the business, investment thesis, risks, and valuation.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company exposure across accounts and funds
Share of portfolio value by account
Signals that deserve a closer look
All accounts · September reference prices
| Company | Portfolio weight | Average cost / share | Current price | Return on cost | Research zone |
|---|
Only the designated FolioFacts administrator should sign in. Public user accounts are not available.
Continue with Google →Showing holdings in selected accounts.
Enter a holding and its account details.
Start with an existing export, or use our template.
Only the holdings you confirm are saved.
| Company | Account | Weight | Return | Shares | Cost basis | Value | Price date | Actions |
|---|
Delete your saved portfolio to remove its positions from this site’s active storage.
Ratings, opportunity scores, and fair values are independent research opinions based on stated assumptions—not personalized investment recommendations. Read our Disclaimer.
Search the US ticker directory by company or symbol. Tickers not found require your confirmation before adding.
| Watchlist rank | Company | Research tier | Zone | Price used | Quality | Model opportunity | Return to fair value | Fair value | Actions |
|---|
Watchlist ranks compare displayed Opportunity Scores across the full list. Filters keep those ranks; equal scores share a rank. Opportunity Scores remain research-model snapshots.
Explore full company reports, business fundamentals, and valuation analysis. Search by name, ticker, or tracking tier.
Price snapshot: 2026-11-03 · Research: 2026-10-21 · Saved analysis, not live market data
Ratings and fair values are independent, dated research opinions—not personalized investment advice. Disclaimer
The reference price is above the probability-weighted fair value.
Dashed marker: reference price $41.11. Scenario values are present fair values, not dated price targets.
3Y revenue CAGR 16%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.70 after compensation; 22× P/E; 13% discount rate; Slower adoption and continued costs produce $0.70 of 2029 sustainable EPS.
Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible3Y revenue CAGR 25%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.30 after compensation; 32× P/E; 13% discount rate; The central revenue and margin trajectory produces $1.30 of 2029 sustainable EPS.
Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress3Y revenue CAGR 34%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.00 after compensation; 40× P/E; 13% discount rate; Strong adoption and mature margins produce $2.00 of 2029 sustainable EPS.
Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assuredFolioFacts zones calculated from the saved fair and bear values at the dated reference price. Live zones can change with research.
The platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. Q2 FY27 revenue and ARR both grew approximately 30%. The challenge is converting that growth into economic earnings after compensation and sustaining customer returns as competition expands. High recurring growth does not eliminate the risk of paying an excessive revenue multiple.
Reported FY totals, current FY quarters and cumulative YTD are grouped separately.
Scale within group: $1,800M
Scale within group: $520M
Scale within group: $1,000M
Completed FY, standalone current-year quarters and cumulative YTD. No TTM figures.
Each row covers a completed fiscal year. Scale within this group: $320M.
Each row covers an independent quarter; derived cash flow is labeled. Scale within this group: $98M.
YTD totals overlap the quarters above and must not be added to them. Scale within this group: $180M.
Each annual, quarter and YTD group uses a separate scale. SBC / FCF is a same-period comparison, not a literal employee cash payment. N/M means FCF is zero or negative (or SBC is negative); missing is not zero. Issuer FCF definitions may vary.
Only completed fiscal years and currently open fiscal-year quarters/YTD appear in charts. Standalone quarters and cumulative YTD are separate; missing is never zero. Legacy TTM rows remain in archival source text. The full financial profile below preserves definitions, accounting caveats, and period-end balance details.
This score uses the saved price and research fundamentals. Creator Watchlist calculates the current score and rank using verified market prices.
Watch the evidence behind the thesis, not just the ticker.
Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 25% annual growth on a comparable basis
Growth remains below the 16% bear assumption over a full operating cycle
Affects: Revenue outlook and scenario probabilitiesAfter-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 22.7%
Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable
Affects: Margins, moat score and valuation multipleFinancing and compensation remain consistent with 630.6M economic shares in the 2029 base case
Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings
Affects: Financial score, confidence and downside valueThe platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. Q2 FY27 revenue and ARR both grew approximately 30%. The challenge is converting that growth into economic earnings after compensation and sustaining customer returns as competition expands. High recurring growth does not eliminate the risk of paying an excessive revenue multiple.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Large-customer expansion and product attachment | The platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. |
| Customer ROI and direct competition | Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value. |
| SBC, dilution and sustainable cash margins | Q2 revenue was $508.4 million and ARR $2.125 billion. |
Samsara sells subscription software and connected devices for fleets and physical operations. Cameras, vehicle telematics, equipment monitoring and workflow applications help customers improve safety, utilization and compliance. Hardware enables data collection, while multi-year subscriptions and expansion into additional applications drive recurring revenue. Distribution includes direct enterprise sales and partners across transportation, field services, construction and other asset-intensive industries.
Samsara sells subscription software and connected devices for fleets and physical operations. Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value.
Connected operations remain underpenetrated across large physical industries. Addressable vehicles and equipment are useful context, but only a subset supports the same price, connectivity and sales economics. Fleet regulation, privacy concerns and customers' capital budgets influence adoption.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geotab (private) | Direct: connected-fleet telematics and operations software | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for fleet operating budgets | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Motive (private) | Direct: fleet telematics, video safety and driver workflows | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for fleet and safety subscriptions | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Lytx (private) | Direct segment: video-based fleet safety | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes in driver-safety deployments | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Fleet regulation, privacy concerns and customers' capital budgets influence adoption. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
The shared buyer manages fleets and physical assets. Cloudflare and Rubrik do not sell substitute fleet-management products and are removed.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geotab (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct: connected-fleet telematics and operations software | Fleet data integrations and configurable ecosystem | Deployment and product packaging differ | Competes for fleet operating budgets |
| Motive (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct: fleet telematics, video safety and driver workflows | Integrated trucking/fleet operations | Customer mix differs across physical-operation verticals | Competes for fleet and safety subscriptions |
| Lytx (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: video-based fleet safety | Dedicated video-safety workflow | Narrower than Samsara's broader operations platform | Competes in driver-safety deployments |
Workflow integration, accumulated operating data and an expanding application set create moderate switching costs. Geotab and Motive remain important direct competitors. Data volume alone is not a moat unless it improves outcomes that customers cannot obtain economically elsewhere.
Moat direction: Strengthening — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Workflow integration, accumulated operating data and an expanding application set create moderate switching costs. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2027. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1,249 | 33.26% | 76.20% | -14.82% | 111.48 | 8.92% | 277.87 | 556 | 694.8 | 80.28 |
| FY2026 | 1,619 | 29.57% | 76.80% | -3.25% | 207.44 | 12.82% | 314.98 | 573 | 833.79 | 72.77 |
| Q1 FY2027 | $478.844 | N/D | 75.4% | 1.5% | $73.177 (derived: CFO - capex) | 15.3% | $77.471 | 587.674 | $218.986 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2027 | $508.437 | N/D | 77.2% | 1.0% | $64.741 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 12.7% | $96.385 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 590.465 | $291.392 | N/D |
| H1 FY2027 | $987.281 | N/D | 76.3% | 1.2% | $137.918 (derived: CFO - capex) | 14.0% | $173.856 | 589.07 | $291.392 | N/D |
Q2 revenue was $508.4 million and ARR $2.125 billion. TTM FCF of $255.5 million was below SBC of $330.6 million, so economic profitability remains less mature than adjusted cash margins suggest. The model includes compensation costs and future dilution rather than valuing subscription growth as fully distributable cash. Management attributes part of the near-term cash-conversion lag to component supply and cost inflation. Recovery in cash margins should be demonstrated rather than assumed from strong bookings alone.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.11 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $24.82B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.57B |
| Trailing P/E | 275.67 |
| Provider forward P/E | 50.20 |
| EV / Sales | 12.76 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOT — Samsara Inc. | Subject company | Public | 50.20 | 12.76 | connected operations software; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 21.72%; operating margin 1.05% |
| Geotab; Motive | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Private | N/A | N/A | direct connected-fleet and operations platforms; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
| Lytx (private) | Direct segment: video-based fleet safety | Private | N/A — private | N/A — private | Competes in driver-safety deployments |
Comparable takeaway: The shared buyer manages fleets and physical assets. Cloudflare and Rubrik do not sell substitute fleet-management products and are removed. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 32×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 50.2×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $45.23, versus the central base FV of $28.83. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 16%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.70 after compensation; 22× P/E; 13% discount rate; Slower adoption and continued costs produce $0.70 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $10.67 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -74.0% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 25%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.30 after compensation; 32× P/E; 13% discount rate; The central revenue and margin trajectory produces $1.30 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $28.83 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | -29.9% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 34%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.00 after compensation; 40× P/E; 13% discount rate; Strong adoption and mature margins produce $2.00 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $55.44 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +34.9% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $30.94 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | -24.7% |
Sanjit Biswas and the team have executed well on enterprise expansion. Reinvestment should be evaluated through retention, productivity and economic margins. Monitor whether AI features raise customer value and paid adoption without materially increasing service costs.
Monitor whether AI features raise customer value and paid adoption without materially increasing service costs.
Analyzed call: Q2 FY2027, complete material Q&A · Research snapshot: 2026-10-21
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dylan Becker / William Blair | How do component costs affect cash flow, and are the pressures temporary? | Management said it considers the component pressures temporary. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Michael Turrin / Wells Fargo | How did bookings timing affect the quarter and later-period assumptions? | Management said the quarter was strong and later assumptions were normalized. | Treat the stated timetable as conditional on demonstrated execution. |
| Alex Zukin / Wolfe Research | How do the camera products expand the growth opportunity? | Management said new use cases broaden the opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Hedberg / RBC | What supports early demand, including public-sector expansion? | Management said a large engagement pipeline supports expansion. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Lucas Cerisola / Morgan Stanley | How do international demand and fuel costs influence adoption? | Management said operational savings support adoption. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Martino / Goldman Sachs | How do emerging products change sales opportunities? | Management said the broader portfolio expands selling opportunities. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Kirk Materne / Evercore | How is inflation affecting near-term economics? | Management said the supply cycle affects near-term economics. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Bullock / Bank of America | How much expansion opportunity remains in existing large customers? | Management said existing accounts retain substantial whitespace. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Nick Altmann / BTIG | How are public-sector customer wins expanding market reach? | Management said new customers broaden its reach. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Mark Schappel / Loop Capital | How do channels and asset-tracking tags expand distribution? | Management said marketplace distribution and tracking products expand distribution opportunities. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Jason Celino / KeyBanc Capital Markets | How are product mix and retention evolving as new categories grow? | Management said emerging categories are becoming more material. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Isabella Camaj / JPMorgan | Are AI agents being used in production customer workflows? | Management said real deployments are expanding customer workflows. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
Bookings and product breadth are strong, but component costs temporarily weaken cash conversion. New products should sustain retention and cash margins rather than merely expand the addressable market.
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.sec.gov | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 FY2027 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| IOT complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 FY2027 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| IOT regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| IOT valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| IOT historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| IOT historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| IOT historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Samsara comparison with Geotab | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current issuer comparison; checked 2026-10-28 | Fleet-telematics product overlap; competitive claims are vendor-presented |
| Samsara comparison with Motive | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current issuer comparison; checked 2026-10-28 | Connected-fleet and safety workflow overlap |
| SEC XBRL company facts — IOT | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2027, through 2026-08-01 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
Company: Samsara Inc.
Ticker: IOT
Exchange: Nasdaq
Sector / Industry: Technology / connected operations software
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $41.11 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: No
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 FY2027
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2026, FY 2025; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 FY2027, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Company: Samsara Inc.
Ticker: IOT
Exchange: Nasdaq
Sector / Industry: Technology / connected operations software
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $41.11 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: No
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 FY2027
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2026, FY 2025; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 FY2027, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Current Review: 2026-10-28
Previous Review: 2026-10-21
Update Trigger: Competitor relevance and analyst-Q&A correction
| Area | Previous View | Current View | Investment Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition | Preceding operating and comparable-company classifications | Product/customer/geographic boundaries corrected; direct rivals separated from substitutes, partners and valuation anchors | Corrects the competitive comparison; does not by itself re-underwrite the valuation |
| Analyst questions | Prior source-linked Q&A summaries | Complete questions and sentence-form management answers; all 12 existing rows retained | Improves readability while preserving the recorded exchange meaning |
| Valuation and scores | Approved operating/price snapshots, scenarios, scores and decisions | Preserved | No price refresh, rerank or change to valuation assumptions in this correction pass |
Thesis: No new fundamental thesis determination is made in this correction pass. The prior investment decision is preserved; the corrected competitive scope should govern the next substantive review.
| Metric | Current View |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.11 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Rating / Zone Status | Avoid |
| Bear / Base / Bull Fair Value | $10.67 / $28.83 / $55.44 |
| Scenario Probabilities | 25% / 50% / 25% |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | $30.94 |
| Probability-Weighted Expected Return | -24.7% |
| Bear-Case Return | -74.0% |
| Strong Buy Zone | ≤ $11.74 |
| Buy Zone | >$11.74–$24.75 |
| Avoid Chasing Above | > $34.38 |
| Quality Score / Tier | 79.2 / Tier B |
| Opportunity Score / Rank | 32.6 / #60 of 76 |
| Risk Level | Medium-High |
| Tracking / Ownership | Primary Watchlist / Not Owned |
Decision rationale: IOT is Avoid at $42.39, with -27.0% probability-weighted upside and -74.8% bear-case return. The platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. Confidence is 58/100 because the earnings conversion, competitive and capital assumptions below remain conditional.
The platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. Q2 FY27 revenue and ARR both grew approximately 30%. The challenge is converting that growth into economic earnings after compensation and sustaining customer returns as competition expands. High recurring growth does not eliminate the risk of paying an excessive revenue multiple.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Large-customer expansion and product attachment | The platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. |
| Customer ROI and direct competition | Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value. |
| SBC, dilution and sustainable cash margins | Q2 revenue was $508.4 million and ARR $2.125 billion. |
Samsara sells subscription software and connected devices for fleets and physical operations. Cameras, vehicle telematics, equipment monitoring and workflow applications help customers improve safety, utilization and compliance. Hardware enables data collection, while multi-year subscriptions and expansion into additional applications drive recurring revenue. Distribution includes direct enterprise sales and partners across transportation, field services, construction and other asset-intensive industries.
Samsara sells subscription software and connected devices for fleets and physical operations. Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value.
Connected operations remain underpenetrated across large physical industries. Addressable vehicles and equipment are useful context, but only a subset supports the same price, connectivity and sales economics. Fleet regulation, privacy concerns and customers' capital budgets influence adoption.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geotab (private) | Direct: connected-fleet telematics and operations software | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for fleet operating budgets | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Motive (private) | Direct: fleet telematics, video safety and driver workflows | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for fleet and safety subscriptions | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Lytx (private) | Direct segment: video-based fleet safety | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes in driver-safety deployments | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Fleet regulation, privacy concerns and customers' capital budgets influence adoption. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value. Hardware deployment and customer support create real acquisition costs. A broader platform can improve retention, but customer ROI must survive renewal pricing and competitors' offers.
The economic test is SBC, dilution and sustainable cash margins. A broader platform can improve retention, but customer ROI must survive renewal pricing and competitors' offers.
The shared buyer manages fleets and physical assets. Cloudflare and Rubrik do not sell substitute fleet-management products and are removed.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geotab (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct: connected-fleet telematics and operations software | Fleet data integrations and configurable ecosystem | Deployment and product packaging differ | Competes for fleet operating budgets |
| Motive (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct: fleet telematics, video safety and driver workflows | Integrated trucking/fleet operations | Customer mix differs across physical-operation verticals | Competes for fleet and safety subscriptions |
| Lytx (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: video-based fleet safety | Dedicated video-safety workflow | Narrower than Samsara's broader operations platform | Competes in driver-safety deployments |
Workflow integration, accumulated operating data and an expanding application set create moderate switching costs. Geotab and Motive remain important direct competitors. Data volume alone is not a moat unless it improves outcomes that customers cannot obtain economically elsewhere.
Moat direction: Strengthening — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Workflow integration, accumulated operating data and an expanding application set create moderate switching costs. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2027. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 1,249 | 33.26% | 76.20% | -14.82% | 111.48 | 8.92% | 277.87 | 556 | 694.8 | 80.28 |
| FY2026 | 1,619 | 29.57% | 76.80% | -3.25% | 207.44 | 12.82% | 314.98 | 573 | 833.79 | 72.77 |
| Q1 FY2027 | $478.844 | N/D | 75.4% | 1.5% | $73.177 (derived: CFO - capex) | 15.3% | $77.471 | 587.674 | $218.986 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2027 | $508.437 | N/D | 77.2% | 1.0% | $64.741 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 12.7% | $96.385 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 590.465 | $291.392 | N/D |
| H1 FY2027 | $987.281 | N/D | 76.3% | 1.2% | $137.918 (derived: CFO - capex) | 14.0% | $173.856 | 589.07 | $291.392 | N/D |
Q2 revenue was $508.4 million and ARR $2.125 billion. TTM FCF of $255.5 million was below SBC of $330.6 million, so economic profitability remains less mature than adjusted cash margins suggest. The model includes compensation costs and future dilution rather than valuing subscription growth as fully distributable cash. Management attributes part of the near-term cash-conversion lag to component supply and cost inflation. Recovery in cash margins should be demonstrated rather than assumed from strong bookings alone.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
Sanjit Biswas and the team have executed well on enterprise expansion. Reinvestment should be evaluated through retention, productivity and economic margins. Monitor whether AI features raise customer value and paid adoption without materially increasing service costs.
Monitor whether AI features raise customer value and paid adoption without materially increasing service costs.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.11 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $24.82B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.57B |
| Trailing P/E | 275.67 |
| Provider forward P/E | 50.20 |
| EV / Sales | 12.76 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOT — Samsara Inc. | Subject company | Public | 50.20 | 12.76 | connected operations software; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 21.72%; operating margin 1.05% |
| Geotab; Motive | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Private | N/A | N/A | direct connected-fleet and operations platforms; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
| Lytx (private) | Direct segment: video-based fleet safety | Private | N/A — private | N/A — private | Competes in driver-safety deployments |
Comparable takeaway: The shared buyer manages fleets and physical assets. Cloudflare and Rubrik do not sell substitute fleet-management products and are removed. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 32×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 50.2×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $45.23, versus the central base FV of $28.83. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 16%; sustainable 2029 EPS $0.70 after compensation; 22× P/E; 13% discount rate; Slower adoption and continued costs produce $0.70 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $10.67 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -74.0% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 25%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.30 after compensation; 32× P/E; 13% discount rate; The central revenue and margin trajectory produces $1.30 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $28.83 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | -29.9% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 34%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.00 after compensation; 40× P/E; 13% discount rate; Strong adoption and mature margins produce $2.00 of 2029 sustainable EPS. | $55.44 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +34.9% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $30.94 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | -24.7% |
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dylan Becker / William Blair | How do component costs affect cash flow, and are the pressures temporary? | Management said it considers the component pressures temporary. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Michael Turrin / Wells Fargo | How did bookings timing affect the quarter and later-period assumptions? | Management said the quarter was strong and later assumptions were normalized. | Treat the stated timetable as conditional on demonstrated execution. |
| Alex Zukin / Wolfe Research | How do the camera products expand the growth opportunity? | Management said new use cases broaden the opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Hedberg / RBC | What supports early demand, including public-sector expansion? | Management said a large engagement pipeline supports expansion. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Lucas Cerisola / Morgan Stanley | How do international demand and fuel costs influence adoption? | Management said operational savings support adoption. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Martino / Goldman Sachs | How do emerging products change sales opportunities? | Management said the broader portfolio expands selling opportunities. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Kirk Materne / Evercore | How is inflation affecting near-term economics? | Management said the supply cycle affects near-term economics. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Bullock / Bank of America | How much expansion opportunity remains in existing large customers? | Management said existing accounts retain substantial whitespace. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Nick Altmann / BTIG | How are public-sector customer wins expanding market reach? | Management said new customers broaden its reach. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Mark Schappel / Loop Capital | How do channels and asset-tracking tags expand distribution? | Management said marketplace distribution and tracking products expand distribution opportunities. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Jason Celino / KeyBanc Capital Markets | How are product mix and retention evolving as new categories grow? | Management said emerging categories are becoming more material. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Isabella Camaj / JPMorgan | Are AI agents being used in production customer workflows? | Management said real deployments are expanding customer workflows. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
Bookings and product breadth are strong, but component costs temporarily weaken cash conversion. New products should sustain retention and cash margins rather than merely expand the addressable market.
| Driver | Current State | Positive Trigger / Catalyst | Negative Trigger / Falsifier | What It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large-customer expansion and product attachment | The platform can compound value by embedding itself in customers' operating processes and expanding products per account. | Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 25% annual growth on a comparable basis | Growth remains below the 16% bear assumption over a full operating cycle | Revenue outlook and scenario probabilities |
| Customer ROI and direct competition | Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value. | After-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 22.7% | Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable | Margins, moat score and valuation multiple |
| SBC, dilution and sustainable cash margins | Q2 revenue was $508.4 million and ARR $2.125 billion. | Financing and compensation remain consistent with 630.6M economic shares in the 2029 base case | Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings | Financial score, confidence and downside value |
| Component | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business durability and economics | 82 | 25% | 20.5 | Large-customer retention, product attachment, expansion ARR and realized safety or efficiency savings determine lifetime value. |
| Moat and competitive position | 79 | 25% | 19.8 | Workflow integration, accumulated operating data and an expanding application set create moderate switching costs. |
| Growth runway and durability | 88 | 20% | 17.6 | Connected operations remain underpenetrated across large physical industries. |
| Financial quality and balance sheet | 68 | 15% | 10.2 | Q2 revenue was $508.4 million and ARR $2.125 billion. |
| Management, governance and capital allocation | 74 | 15% | 11.1 | Sanjit Biswas and the team have executed well on enterprise expansion. |
| Quality Score | 79.2 | 100% | 79.2 | Weighted score, independent of ownership and current price |
| Component | Raw Input | Normalized Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 79.2 | 79.2 | 30% | 23.8 |
| Probability-weighted upside | -24.7% | 0.5 | 35% | 0.2 |
| Bear-case downside | -74.0% | 0.0 | 20% | 0.0 |
| Risk / valuation confidence | 58 | 58.0 | 15% | 8.7 |
| Opportunity Score | 32.6 | 100% | 32.6 |
my_watchlist.mdportfolio/holdings.md| Timestamp | Price | Rating | Zone Status | Buy Zone | Strong Buy Zone | Avoid Chasing Above | Base FV | P/W FV | P/W Return | Quality | Opportunity / Rank | Change / Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 (America/New_York) | $42.39 | Avoid | Avoid | >$11.74–$24.75 | ≤ $11.74 | > $34.38 | $28.83 | $30.94 | -27.0% | 79.2 | 32.5 / #54 | Initial missing-file analysis; common-universe ranking; independent scenario assumptions |
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.sec.gov | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 FY2027 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| IOT complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 FY2027 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| IOT regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| IOT valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| IOT historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| IOT historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| IOT historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Samsara comparison with Geotab | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current issuer comparison; checked 2026-10-28 | Fleet-telematics product overlap; competitive claims are vendor-presented |
| Samsara comparison with Motive | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current issuer comparison; checked 2026-10-28 | Connected-fleet and safety workflow overlap |
| SEC XBRL company facts — IOT | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2027, through 2026-08-01 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
This page presents the saved IOT analysis. Ratings, zones, and opportunity scores shown above are recalculated at its dated reference price using FolioFacts rules; the live Creator Watchlist uses current market prices and can differ. Missing financial data is not estimated.
This publication reflects my personal investment research, thoughts, and opinions only. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Any ratings or views expressed are general analytical opinions, not recommendations tailored to any reader or offers or solicitations to buy or sell any security or financial instrument.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. This content does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. All investments involve substantial risk, including the potential loss of all principal capital. Past performance is never indicative of future results.
While I endeavor to provide accurate information, all data and analysis are provided "as is" without any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. You must conduct your own independent due diligence and/or consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. I may hold long or short positions in any of the securities or assets discussed herein at any time without notice.
Quality is price independent. Opportunity combines that quality with scenario-based upside, bear-case protection, and confidence. Ownership and cost basis do not affect these scores. Watchlist rank compares the scored companies in that Watchlist.
Model scores, valuation estimates, and price zones are based on assumptions, not guarantees of future performance or individualized advice. Read our Disclaimer.
25% business durability
25% moat and competitive position
20% growth runway
15% financial quality
15% management and capital allocation
30% Quality Score
35% normalized probability-weighted upside
20% normalized bear-case return
15% risk and valuation confidence
At least 50% upside to P/W fair value, with price no more than 10% above bear-case fair value.
At least 25% upside to P/W fair value, above the Strong Buy boundary.
Modeled return from approximately −10% to below +25%.
More than 10% downside to P/W fair value.
Risk-adjusted view. This framework balances expected upside, downside risk and valuation confidence. Zones may be less reliable for companies priced mainly on future potential rather than current fundamentals.
These prompt a review of the research and Opportunity Score. Watchlist ranks are calculated automatically from the scores currently displayed.