Your portfolio starts here.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company research on Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE), including the business, investment thesis, risks, and valuation.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company exposure across accounts and funds
Share of portfolio value by account
Signals that deserve a closer look
All accounts · September reference prices
| Company | Portfolio weight | Average cost / share | Current price | Return on cost | Research zone |
|---|
Only the designated FolioFacts administrator should sign in. Public user accounts are not available.
Continue with Google →Showing holdings in selected accounts.
Enter a holding and its account details.
Start with an existing export, or use our template.
Only the holdings you confirm are saved.
| Company | Account | Weight | Return | Shares | Cost basis | Value | Price date | Actions |
|---|
Delete your saved portfolio to remove its positions from this site’s active storage.
Ratings, opportunity scores, and fair values are independent research opinions based on stated assumptions—not personalized investment recommendations. Read our Disclaimer.
Search the US ticker directory by company or symbol. Tickers not found require your confirmation before adding.
| Watchlist rank | Company | Research tier | Zone | Price used | Quality | Model opportunity | Return to fair value | Fair value | Actions |
|---|
Watchlist ranks compare displayed Opportunity Scores across the full list. Filters keep those ranks; equal scores share a rank. Opportunity Scores remain research-model snapshots.
Explore full company reports, business fundamentals, and valuation analysis. Search by name, ticker, or tracking tier.
Price snapshot: 2026-11-03 · Research: 2026-10-21 · Saved analysis, not live market data
Ratings and fair values are independent, dated research opinions—not personalized investment advice. Disclaimer
The reference price is below the probability-weighted fair value.
Dashed marker: reference price $41.58. Scenario values are present fair values, not dated price targets.
3Y revenue CAGR 12%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.25 after compensation; 18× P/E; 13% discount rate; Merchant growth slows and cost pressure limits 2029 economic EPS to $1.25.
Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible3Y revenue CAGR 24%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.50 after compensation; 25× P/E; 13% discount rate; Cross-border adoption and operating leverage produce $2.50 of 2029 economic EPS.
Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress3Y revenue CAGR 34%; sustainable 2029 EPS $4.00 after compensation; 30× P/E; 13% discount rate; Enterprise launches and platform distribution scale successfully, producing $4 of 2029 economic EPS.
Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assuredFolioFacts zones calculated from the saved fair and bear values at the dated reference price. Live zones can change with research.
Cross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. Q2 GMV rose 44%, revenue 39% and adjusted EBITDA 62%. The central debate is whether this momentum continues after promotions, acquisition contributions and the migration to Managed Markets V2. The model allows profitable growth without assuming the exceptional latest quarter persists indefinitely.
Reported FY totals, current FY quarters and cumulative YTD are grouped separately.
Scale within group: $980M
Scale within group: $300M
Scale within group: $560M
Completed FY, standalone current-year quarters and cumulative YTD. No TTM figures.
Each row covers a completed fiscal year. Scale within this group: $300M.
Each row covers an independent quarter; derived cash flow is labeled. Scale within this group: $74M.
YTD totals overlap the quarters above and must not be added to them. Scale within this group: $22M.
Each annual, quarter and YTD group uses a separate scale. SBC / FCF is a same-period comparison, not a literal employee cash payment. N/M means FCF is zero or negative (or SBC is negative); missing is not zero. Issuer FCF definitions may vary.
Only completed fiscal years and currently open fiscal-year quarters/YTD appear in charts. Standalone quarters and cumulative YTD are separate; missing is never zero. Legacy TTM rows remain in archival source text. The full financial profile below preserves definitions, accounting caveats, and period-end balance details.
This score uses the saved price and research fundamentals. Creator Watchlist calculates the current score and rank using verified market prices.
Watch the evidence behind the thesis, not just the ticker.
Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 24% annual growth on a comparable basis
Growth remains below the 12% bear assumption over a full operating cycle
Affects: Revenue outlook and scenario probabilitiesAfter-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 20.3%
Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable
Affects: Margins, moat score and valuation multipleFinancing and compensation remain consistent with 172.0M economic shares in the 2029 base case
Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings
Affects: Financial score, confidence and downside valueCross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. Q2 GMV rose 44%, revenue 39% and adjusted EBITDA 62%. The central debate is whether this momentum continues after promotions, acquisition contributions and the migration to Managed Markets V2. The model allows profitable growth without assuming the exceptional latest quarter persists indefinitely.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Merchant cohorts and Managed Markets adoption | Cross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. |
| Tariffs, shipping costs and take-rate mix | Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value. |
| Passport integration and seasonal cash conversion | Q2 revenue was $299 million, GAAP gross margin 44.1% and FCF $73.2 million. |
Global-e helps brands sell internationally with localized checkout, payments, tax and duty calculation, compliance and fulfillment services. Merchant-of-record and other service models reduce the complexity of entering many countries. Revenue combines service fees with fulfillment services that include substantial pass-through costs. Direct enterprise brands and Shopify Managed Markets supply different distribution paths, while Passport expands product coverage.
Global-e helps brands sell internationally with localized checkout, payments, tax and duty calculation, compliance and fulfillment services. Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value.
International e-commerce provides whitespace, while tariffs and changing de minimis rules increase compliance needs and can also reduce merchant demand. The relevant TAM is profitable cross-border brand commerce, rather than all global online retail sales. Shopify's own strategic choices remain a material distribution dependency.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESW (private) | Direct: cross-border checkout and merchant-of-record services | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for international commerce enablement | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Merchant in-house operations | Substitute: own tax, duty, payments and fulfillment stack | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Build-versus-buy decision for large brands | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Shopify's own strategic choices remain a material distribution dependency. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Global-e competes in cross-border commerce enablement. Shopify is a distribution partner and commerce platform; dLocal is a payment-infrastructure provider. Neither is treated as an interchangeable merchant-of-record competitor.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESW (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct: cross-border checkout and merchant-of-record services | Enterprise localization and compliance operations | Global-e has distinct merchant/channel integrations | Competes for international commerce enablement |
| Merchant in-house operations | No consistent comparable series | Substitute: own tax, duty, payments and fulfillment stack | Merchant controls customer experience and provider spending | Requires maintaining local operational and compliance capabilities | Build-versus-buy decision for large brands |
Country-level operating infrastructure, payments integrations and merchant workflows create meaningful switching costs. Shopify alignment increases reach while concentrating platform dependence. Private specialists and in-house merchant operations remain relevant competitors.
Moat direction: Strengthening — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Country-level operating infrastructure, payments integrations and merchant workflows create meaningful switching costs. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Standardized period history (reviewed 2026-11-07): Completed issuer fiscal years only, plus actually disclosed standalone quarters and cumulative YTD for the latest open FY. Currency USD, flows in millions, with fiscal dates defined by the issuer. Values marked derived come from disclosed period differences/sums, not TTM. Missing = N/D (not zero). FCF = operating cash flow less capital expenditure. Q1 financials are derived by subtracting the disclosed Q2 standalone results from H1; seasonal settlement and working-capital swings matter.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 752.76 | 32.08% | 45.09% | -9.02% | 167.06 | 22.19% | 39.16 | 167 | 474.44 | 24.86 |
| FY2025 | 962.2 | 27.82% | 45.34% | 7.50% | 280.68 | 29.17% | 39.35 | 176 | 622.84 | 23.5 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $252.086M (derived from disclosed periods) | N/D | 45.6% | N/D | −$72.915M (derived from disclosed periods) | -28.9% | $9.95M (derived from disclosed periods) | N/D | N/D | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $299M | N/D | 44.1% | N/D | $73.186M | 24.5% | $11.032M | N/D | N/D | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $551.086M | N/D | 44.8% | N/D | $0.271M | 0.0% | $20.982M | N/D | N/D | N/D |
Q2 revenue was $299 million, GAAP gross margin 44.1% and FCF $73.2 million. Quarterly cash flow is seasonal and influenced by merchant settlements; Q1 was negative. TTM SBC of $41.5 million is modest relative to many software peers but remains a shareholder cost. Repurchases and acquisition spending must be assessed together.
Financial direction: Improving — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.58 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $7.02B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.51B |
| Trailing P/E | 48.43 |
| Provider forward P/E | 30.32 |
| EV / Sales | 5.88 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLBE — Global-e Online Ltd. | Subject company | Public | 30.32 | 5.88 | cross-border commerce enablement; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 31.02%; operating margin 14.30% |
| ESW; merchant in-house operations | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Unquoted / in-house | N/A | N/A | cross-border checkout and local infrastructure; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
Comparable takeaway: Global-e competes in cross-border commerce enablement. Shopify is a distribution partner and commerce platform; dLocal is a payment-infrastructure provider. Neither is treated as an interchangeable merchant-of-record competitor. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 25×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 30.32×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $52.53, versus the central base FV of $43.32. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 12%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.25 after compensation; 18× P/E; 13% discount rate; Merchant growth slows and cost pressure limits 2029 economic EPS to $1.25. | $15.59 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -62.5% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 24%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.50 after compensation; 25× P/E; 13% discount rate; Cross-border adoption and operating leverage produce $2.50 of 2029 economic EPS. | $43.32 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | +4.2% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 34%; sustainable 2029 EPS $4.00 after compensation; 30× P/E; 13% discount rate; Enterprise launches and platform distribution scale successfully, producing $4 of 2029 economic EPS. | $83.17 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +100.0% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $46.35 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | +11.5% |
Founder-led execution and merchant onboarding have been strong. The investment case depends on preserving service quality while integrating Passport and scaling Managed Markets. Management's margin assumptions should be tested against carrier costs, pricing lags and merchant concentration.
Management's margin assumptions should be tested against carrier costs, pricing lags and merchant concentration.
Analyzed call: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A · Research snapshot: 2026-10-21
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Bauch / BMO | How will the new Managed Markets version improve merchant conversion? | Management said the new version improves merchant onboarding. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Billy Fitzsimmons / Piper Sandler | How do recent merchant cohorts support future growth? | Management said large cohorts provide a foundation for later growth. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Rob Wildhack / Autonomous Research | How did merchant promotions affect quarterly volumes? | Management said promotional activity helped quarterly volumes. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Scott Berg / Needham | Is the migration complete, and how quickly can higher carrier costs be repriced? | Management said the transition is complete, while repricing temporarily lags carrier costs. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| James Faucette / Morgan Stanley | What is the margin objective for Passport? | Management said it aims to move Passport toward group economics. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Craig Maurer / FT Partners | How much distribution runway remains in the Shopify channel? | Management said the channel retains a long-term distribution opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Will Nance / Goldman Sachs | How will mix affect second-half take rates? | Management said the underlying second-half rate should be broadly stable. | Stress monetization if competition or mix reduces economic yield. |
| Mark Zgutowicz / Benchmark | What seasonal pattern is expected for the rest of the year? | Management said it expects the normal later-year seasonal pattern. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Brian Peterson / Raymond James | How healthy is the merchant pipeline, including demand related to AI discovery? | Management said merchant demand remains healthy. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Chris Zhang / UBS | Does the current geographic channel mix limit the long-term opportunity? | Management said current distribution is not the long-term ceiling. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Patrick Walravens / Citizens | How is merchant-onboarding friction being reduced? | Management said faster reviews reduce friction for merchants. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Coad / Truist | How does Passport expand services outside the merchant-of-record model? | Management said Passport broadens the service coverage available to merchants. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Bullock / Bank of America | What limits the timing of duty-drawback cash receipts? | Management said documentation requirements constrain cash timing. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
Managed Markets conversion and merchant cohorts support growth. Carrier repricing and duty-drawback documentation create timing frictions; Passport needs to demonstrate sustainable economics rather than inherit the core business multiple.
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global-e Achieves Significant GMV, Revenue and Profit Expansion in the Second Quarter of 2026, Raises Outlook for the Year / Global-E online Ltd | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| GLBE complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| GLBE regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| GLBE valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| GLBE historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| GLBE historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| GLBE historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| ESW — merchant-of-record services | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current product description; checked 2026-10-28 | Direct cross-border compliance and commerce enablement overlap |
Company: Global-e Online Ltd.
Ticker: GLBE
Exchange: Nasdaq
Sector / Industry: Technology / cross-border commerce enablement
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $41.58 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: completed FY2024-FY2025; Q1 FY2026, Q2 FY2026, H1 FY2026
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Company: Global-e Online Ltd.
Ticker: GLBE
Exchange: Nasdaq
Sector / Industry: Technology / cross-border commerce enablement
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $41.58 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: completed FY2024-FY2025; Q1 FY2026, Q2 FY2026, H1 FY2026
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Current Review: 2026-10-28
Previous Review: 2026-10-21
Update Trigger: Competitor relevance and analyst-Q&A correction
| Area | Previous View | Current View | Investment Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition | Preceding operating and comparable-company classifications | Product/customer/geographic boundaries corrected; direct rivals separated from substitutes, partners and valuation anchors | Corrects the competitive comparison; does not by itself re-underwrite the valuation |
| Analyst questions | Prior source-linked Q&A summaries | Complete questions and sentence-form management answers; all 13 existing rows retained | Improves readability while preserving the recorded exchange meaning |
| Valuation and scores | Approved operating/price snapshots, scenarios, scores and decisions | Preserved | No price refresh, rerank or change to valuation assumptions in this correction pass |
Thesis: No new fundamental thesis determination is made in this correction pass. The prior investment decision is preserved; the corrected competitive scope should govern the next substantive review.
| Metric | Current View |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.58 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Rating / Zone Status | Hold / Watch |
| Bear / Base / Bull Fair Value | $15.59 / $43.32 / $83.17 |
| Scenario Probabilities | 25% / 50% / 25% |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | $46.35 |
| Probability-Weighted Expected Return | +11.5% |
| Bear-Case Return | -62.5% |
| Strong Buy Zone | ≤ $17.15 |
| Buy Zone | >$17.15–$37.08 |
| Avoid Chasing Above | > $51.50 |
| Quality Score / Tier | 78.9 / Tier B |
| Opportunity Score / Rank | 58.0 / #29 of 76 |
| Risk Level | Medium-High |
| Tracking / Ownership | Primary Watchlist / Owned |
Decision rationale: GLBE is Hold / Watch at $41.78, with +10.9% probability-weighted upside and -62.7% bear-case return. Cross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. Confidence is 59/100 because the earnings conversion, competitive and capital assumptions below remain conditional.
Cross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. Q2 GMV rose 44%, revenue 39% and adjusted EBITDA 62%. The central debate is whether this momentum continues after promotions, acquisition contributions and the migration to Managed Markets V2. The model allows profitable growth without assuming the exceptional latest quarter persists indefinitely.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Merchant cohorts and Managed Markets adoption | Cross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. |
| Tariffs, shipping costs and take-rate mix | Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value. |
| Passport integration and seasonal cash conversion | Q2 revenue was $299 million, GAAP gross margin 44.1% and FCF $73.2 million. |
Global-e helps brands sell internationally with localized checkout, payments, tax and duty calculation, compliance and fulfillment services. Merchant-of-record and other service models reduce the complexity of entering many countries. Revenue combines service fees with fulfillment services that include substantial pass-through costs. Direct enterprise brands and Shopify Managed Markets supply different distribution paths, while Passport expands product coverage.
Global-e helps brands sell internationally with localized checkout, payments, tax and duty calculation, compliance and fulfillment services. Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value.
International e-commerce provides whitespace, while tariffs and changing de minimis rules increase compliance needs and can also reduce merchant demand. The relevant TAM is profitable cross-border brand commerce, rather than all global online retail sales. Shopify's own strategic choices remain a material distribution dependency.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESW (private) | Direct: cross-border checkout and merchant-of-record services | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for international commerce enablement | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Merchant in-house operations | Substitute: own tax, duty, payments and fulfillment stack | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Build-versus-buy decision for large brands | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Shopify's own strategic choices remain a material distribution dependency. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value. Q2 gross margin fell despite strong revenue, partly reflecting mix and costs absorbed before repricing. Merchant cohort retention and cash conversion are more useful than a single blended take rate across different service models.
The economic test is Passport integration and seasonal cash conversion. Merchant cohort retention and cash conversion are more useful than a single blended take rate across different service models.
Global-e competes in cross-border commerce enablement. Shopify is a distribution partner and commerce platform; dLocal is a payment-infrastructure provider. Neither is treated as an interchangeable merchant-of-record competitor.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESW (private) | No consistent comparable series | Direct: cross-border checkout and merchant-of-record services | Enterprise localization and compliance operations | Global-e has distinct merchant/channel integrations | Competes for international commerce enablement |
| Merchant in-house operations | No consistent comparable series | Substitute: own tax, duty, payments and fulfillment stack | Merchant controls customer experience and provider spending | Requires maintaining local operational and compliance capabilities | Build-versus-buy decision for large brands |
Country-level operating infrastructure, payments integrations and merchant workflows create meaningful switching costs. Shopify alignment increases reach while concentrating platform dependence. Private specialists and in-house merchant operations remain relevant competitors.
Moat direction: Strengthening — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Country-level operating infrastructure, payments integrations and merchant workflows create meaningful switching costs. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Standardized period history (reviewed 2026-11-07): Completed issuer fiscal years only, plus actually disclosed standalone quarters and cumulative YTD for the latest open FY. Currency USD, flows in millions, with fiscal dates defined by the issuer. Values marked derived come from disclosed period differences/sums, not TTM. Missing = N/D (not zero). FCF = operating cash flow less capital expenditure. Q1 financials are derived by subtracting the disclosed Q2 standalone results from H1; seasonal settlement and working-capital swings matter.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 752.76 | 32.08% | 45.09% | -9.02% | 167.06 | 22.19% | 39.16 | 167 | 474.44 | 24.86 |
| FY2025 | 962.2 | 27.82% | 45.34% | 7.50% | 280.68 | 29.17% | 39.35 | 176 | 622.84 | 23.5 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $252.086M (derived from disclosed periods) | N/D | 45.6% | N/D | −$72.915M (derived from disclosed periods) | -28.9% | $9.95M (derived from disclosed periods) | N/D | N/D | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $299M | N/D | 44.1% | N/D | $73.186M | 24.5% | $11.032M | N/D | N/D | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $551.086M | N/D | 44.8% | N/D | $0.271M | 0.0% | $20.982M | N/D | N/D | N/D |
Q2 revenue was $299 million, GAAP gross margin 44.1% and FCF $73.2 million. Quarterly cash flow is seasonal and influenced by merchant settlements; Q1 was negative. TTM SBC of $41.5 million is modest relative to many software peers but remains a shareholder cost. Repurchases and acquisition spending must be assessed together.
Financial direction: Improving — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
Founder-led execution and merchant onboarding have been strong. The investment case depends on preserving service quality while integrating Passport and scaling Managed Markets. Management's margin assumptions should be tested against carrier costs, pricing lags and merchant concentration.
Management's margin assumptions should be tested against carrier costs, pricing lags and merchant concentration.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.58 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $7.02B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.51B |
| Trailing P/E | 48.43 |
| Provider forward P/E | 30.32 |
| EV / Sales | 5.88 |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLBE — Global-e Online Ltd. | Subject company | Public | 30.32 | 5.88 | cross-border commerce enablement; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 31.02%; operating margin 14.30% |
| ESW; merchant in-house operations | Direct operating competitor / substitute | Unquoted / in-house | N/A | N/A | cross-border checkout and local infrastructure; no compatible standalone public multiple used |
Comparable takeaway: Global-e competes in cross-border commerce enablement. Shopify is a distribution partner and commerce platform; dLocal is a payment-infrastructure provider. Neither is treated as an interchangeable merchant-of-record competitor. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 25×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 30.32×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $52.53, versus the central base FV of $43.32. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 12%; sustainable 2029 EPS $1.25 after compensation; 18× P/E; 13% discount rate; Merchant growth slows and cost pressure limits 2029 economic EPS to $1.25. | $15.59 | 25% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -62.5% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 24%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.50 after compensation; 25× P/E; 13% discount rate; Cross-border adoption and operating leverage produce $2.50 of 2029 economic EPS. | $43.32 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | +4.2% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 34%; sustainable 2029 EPS $4.00 after compensation; 30× P/E; 13% discount rate; Enterprise launches and platform distribution scale successfully, producing $4 of 2029 economic EPS. | $83.17 | 25% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +100.0% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $46.35 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | +11.5% |
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Bauch / BMO | How will the new Managed Markets version improve merchant conversion? | Management said the new version improves merchant onboarding. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Billy Fitzsimmons / Piper Sandler | How do recent merchant cohorts support future growth? | Management said large cohorts provide a foundation for later growth. | Check repeat usage and cohort economics rather than initial sales alone. |
| Rob Wildhack / Autonomous Research | How did merchant promotions affect quarterly volumes? | Management said promotional activity helped quarterly volumes. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Scott Berg / Needham | Is the migration complete, and how quickly can higher carrier costs be repriced? | Management said the transition is complete, while repricing temporarily lags carrier costs. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| James Faucette / Morgan Stanley | What is the margin objective for Passport? | Management said it aims to move Passport toward group economics. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
| Craig Maurer / FT Partners | How much distribution runway remains in the Shopify channel? | Management said the channel retains a long-term distribution opportunity. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Will Nance / Goldman Sachs | How will mix affect second-half take rates? | Management said the underlying second-half rate should be broadly stable. | Stress monetization if competition or mix reduces economic yield. |
| Mark Zgutowicz / Benchmark | What seasonal pattern is expected for the rest of the year? | Management said it expects the normal later-year seasonal pattern. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Brian Peterson / Raymond James | How healthy is the merchant pipeline, including demand related to AI discovery? | Management said merchant demand remains healthy. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Chris Zhang / UBS | Does the current geographic channel mix limit the long-term opportunity? | Management said current distribution is not the long-term ceiling. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Patrick Walravens / Citizens | How is merchant-onboarding friction being reduced? | Management said faster reviews reduce friction for merchants. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Coad / Truist | How does Passport expand services outside the merchant-of-record model? | Management said Passport broadens the service coverage available to merchants. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Matt Bullock / Bank of America | What limits the timing of duty-drawback cash receipts? | Management said documentation requirements constrain cash timing. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
Managed Markets conversion and merchant cohorts support growth. Carrier repricing and duty-drawback documentation create timing frictions; Passport needs to demonstrate sustainable economics rather than inherit the core business multiple.
| Driver | Current State | Positive Trigger / Catalyst | Negative Trigger / Falsifier | What It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merchant cohorts and Managed Markets adoption | Cross-border complexity and a strong merchant pipeline can support sustained growth and operating leverage. | Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 24% annual growth on a comparable basis | Growth remains below the 12% bear assumption over a full operating cycle | Revenue outlook and scenario probabilities |
| Tariffs, shipping costs and take-rate mix | Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value. | After-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 20.3% | Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable | Margins, moat score and valuation multiple |
| Passport integration and seasonal cash conversion | Q2 revenue was $299 million, GAAP gross margin 44.1% and FCF $73.2 million. | Financing and compensation remain consistent with 172.0M economic shares in the 2029 base case | Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings | Financial score, confidence and downside value |
| Component | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business durability and economics | 79 | 25% | 19.8 | Existing-merchant growth, new launches, conversion, take rate and contribution after shipping costs drive value. |
| Moat and competitive position | 78 | 25% | 19.5 | Country-level operating infrastructure, payments integrations and merchant workflows create meaningful switching costs. |
| Growth runway and durability | 85 | 20% | 17.0 | International e-commerce provides whitespace, while tariffs and changing de minimis rules increase compliance needs and can also reduce merchant demand. |
| Financial quality and balance sheet | 76 | 15% | 11.4 | Q2 revenue was $299 million, GAAP gross margin 44.1% and FCF $73.2 million. |
| Management, governance and capital allocation | 75 | 15% | 11.3 | Founder-led execution and merchant onboarding have been strong. |
| Quality Score | 78.9 | 100% | 78.9 | Weighted score, independent of ownership and current price |
| Component | Raw Input | Normalized Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 78.9 | 78.9 | 30% | 23.7 |
| Probability-weighted upside | +11.5% | 72.9 | 35% | 25.5 |
| Bear-case downside | -62.5% | 0.0 | 20% | 0.0 |
| Risk / valuation confidence | 59 | 59.0 | 15% | 8.9 |
| Opportunity Score | 58.0 | 100% | 58.0 |
my_watchlist.mdportfolio/holdings.md| Timestamp | Price | Rating | Zone Status | Buy Zone | Strong Buy Zone | Avoid Chasing Above | Base FV | P/W FV | P/W Return | Quality | Opportunity / Rank | Change / Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 (America/New_York) | $41.78 | Hold / Watch | Hold / Watch | >$17.15–$37.08 | ≤ $17.15 | > $51.50 | $43.32 | $46.35 | +10.9% | 78.9 | 57.7 / #26 | Initial missing-file analysis; common-universe ranking; independent scenario assumptions |
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global-e Achieves Significant GMV, Revenue and Profit Expansion in the Second Quarter of 2026, Raises Outlook for the Year / Global-E online Ltd | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| GLBE complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| GLBE regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| GLBE valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| GLBE historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| GLBE historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| GLBE historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| ESW — merchant-of-record services | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current product description; checked 2026-10-28 | Direct cross-border compliance and commerce enablement overlap |
This page presents the saved GLBE analysis. Ratings, zones, and opportunity scores shown above are recalculated at its dated reference price using FolioFacts rules; the live Creator Watchlist uses current market prices and can differ. Missing financial data is not estimated.
This publication reflects my personal investment research, thoughts, and opinions only. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Any ratings or views expressed are general analytical opinions, not recommendations tailored to any reader or offers or solicitations to buy or sell any security or financial instrument.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. This content does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. All investments involve substantial risk, including the potential loss of all principal capital. Past performance is never indicative of future results.
While I endeavor to provide accurate information, all data and analysis are provided "as is" without any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. You must conduct your own independent due diligence and/or consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. I may hold long or short positions in any of the securities or assets discussed herein at any time without notice.
Quality is price independent. Opportunity combines that quality with scenario-based upside, bear-case protection, and confidence. Ownership and cost basis do not affect these scores. Watchlist rank compares the scored companies in that Watchlist.
Model scores, valuation estimates, and price zones are based on assumptions, not guarantees of future performance or individualized advice. Read our Disclaimer.
25% business durability
25% moat and competitive position
20% growth runway
15% financial quality
15% management and capital allocation
30% Quality Score
35% normalized probability-weighted upside
20% normalized bear-case return
15% risk and valuation confidence
At least 50% upside to P/W fair value, with price no more than 10% above bear-case fair value.
At least 25% upside to P/W fair value, above the Strong Buy boundary.
Modeled return from approximately −10% to below +25%.
More than 10% downside to P/W fair value.
Risk-adjusted view. This framework balances expected upside, downside risk and valuation confidence. Zones may be less reliable for companies priced mainly on future potential rather than current fundamentals.
These prompt a review of the research and Opportunity Score. Watchlist ranks are calculated automatically from the scores currently displayed.