Your portfolio starts here.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company research on Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR), including the business, investment thesis, risks, and valuation.
Sign in to see your own allocation, returns, holdings and portfolio research signals. Your holdings remain private to your account.
Continue with Google →Company exposure across accounts and funds
Share of portfolio value by account
Signals that deserve a closer look
All accounts · September reference prices
| Company | Portfolio weight | Average cost / share | Current price | Return on cost | Research zone |
|---|
Only the designated FolioFacts administrator should sign in. Public user accounts are not available.
Continue with Google →Showing holdings in selected accounts.
Enter a holding and its account details.
Start with an existing export, or use our template.
Only the holdings you confirm are saved.
| Company | Account | Weight | Return | Shares | Cost basis | Value | Price date | Actions |
|---|
Delete your saved portfolio to remove its positions from this site’s active storage.
Ratings, opportunity scores, and fair values are independent research opinions based on stated assumptions—not personalized investment recommendations. Read our Disclaimer.
Search the US ticker directory by company or symbol. Tickers not found require your confirmation before adding.
| Watchlist rank | Company | Research tier | Zone | Price used | Quality | Model opportunity | Return to fair value | Fair value | Actions |
|---|
Watchlist ranks compare displayed Opportunity Scores across the full list. Filters keep those ranks; equal scores share a rank. Opportunity Scores remain research-model snapshots.
Explore full company reports, business fundamentals, and valuation analysis. Search by name, ticker, or tracking tier.
Price snapshot: 2026-11-03 · Research: 2026-10-21 · Saved analysis, not live market data
Ratings and fair values are independent, dated research opinions—not personalized investment advice. Disclaimer
The reference price is below the probability-weighted fair value.
Dashed marker: reference price $41.49. Scenario values are present fair values, not dated price targets.
3Y revenue CAGR 5%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.00 after compensation; 10× P/E; 15% discount rate; Weaker organic growth and financing pressure leave 2029 common-holder economic EPS at $2.
Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible3Y revenue CAGR 14%; sustainable 2029 EPS $5.00 after compensation; 15× P/E; 15% discount rate; Integration succeeds and cash conversion recovers, producing $5 of 2029 economic EPS after all common-holder claims.
Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress3Y revenue CAGR 24%; sustainable 2029 EPS $8.00 after compensation; 18× P/E; 15% discount rate; Distribution scales with strong integration execution, producing $8 of 2029 economic EPS.
Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assuredFolioFacts zones calculated from the saved fair and bear values at the dated reference price. Live zones can change with research.
Integrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. Q2 gross revenue rose 34% and retained revenue 51%, while organic retained-revenue growth was 11%. Adjusted FCF fell sharply and management reduced the outlook for travel-related disruption. Acquisition-driven scale cannot substitute for cash conversion.
Reported FY totals, current FY quarters and cumulative YTD are grouped separately.
Scale within group: $4,200M
Scale within group: $1,400M
Scale within group: $3,800M
Completed FY, standalone current-year quarters and cumulative YTD. No TTM figures.
Each row covers a completed fiscal year. Scale within this group: $500M.
Each row covers an independent quarter; derived cash flow is labeled. Scale within this group: $220M.
YTD totals overlap the quarters above and must not be added to them. Scale within this group: $420M.
Each annual, quarter and YTD group uses a separate scale. SBC / FCF is a same-period comparison, not a literal employee cash payment. N/M means FCF is zero or negative (or SBC is negative); missing is not zero. Issuer FCF definitions may vary.
Only completed fiscal years and currently open fiscal-year quarters/YTD appear in charts. Standalone quarters and cumulative YTD are separate; missing is never zero. Legacy TTM rows remain in archival source text. The full financial profile below preserves definitions, accounting caveats, and period-end balance details.
This score uses the saved price and research fundamentals. Creator Watchlist calculates the current score and rank using verified market prices.
Watch the evidence behind the thesis, not just the ticker.
Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 14% annual growth on a comparable basis
Growth remains below the 5% bear assumption over a full operating cycle
Affects: Revenue outlook and scenario probabilitiesAfter-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 12.0%
Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable
Affects: Margins, moat score and valuation multipleFinancing and compensation remain consistent with 170.0M economic shares in the 2029 base case
Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings
Affects: Financial score, confidence and downside valueIntegrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. Q2 gross revenue rose 34% and retained revenue 51%, while organic retained-revenue growth was 11%. Adjusted FCF fell sharply and management reduced the outlook for travel-related disruption. Acquisition-driven scale cannot substitute for cash conversion.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Organic retained-revenue growth and merchant retention | Integrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. |
| Debt service, TRA and Up-C claims | The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition. |
| Travel exposure and acquisition cash conversion | Q2 adjusted EBITDA was $284 million, but operating cash flow was $63 million and adjusted FCF $21 million. |
Shift4 combines payment acceptance with software integrations for restaurants, hotels, venues and other merchants. It monetizes end-to-end processing, subscriptions, gateway services and the acquired tax-free-shopping business. Software vendors and distribution partners help acquire merchants. Gross revenue includes substantial network fees, so gross revenue less network fees and gross profit better describe the retained economic opportunity. Its Up-C structure adds noncontrolling interests, exchangeable units and tax-receivable obligations to the valuation analysis.
Shift4 combines payment acceptance with software integrations for restaurants, hotels, venues and other merchants. The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition.
Merchant digitization and integrated payments support expansion, especially in complex hospitality workflows. Toast, bank acquirers and global processors compete on distribution, software and price. Tax-free shopping adds travel cyclicality and geopolitical exposure distinct from domestic processing.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toast (TOST) | Direct segment: restaurant POS and integrated payments | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for restaurant merchant relationships | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Fiserv — Clover | Direct segment: merchant acquiring and integrated POS | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for merchant processing | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Adyen | Direct segment: enterprise omnichannel acquiring | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for enterprise payment flows | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Global Payments; Worldpay | Direct segment: merchant processing | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for processing contracts | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Tax-free shopping adds travel cyclicality and geopolitical exposure distinct from domestic processing. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
Merchant acquiring, integrated POS and enterprise processing are the relevant markets. PayPal’s consolidated wallet business is excluded as an unhelpful broad payments anchor.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toast (TOST) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: restaurant POS and integrated payments | Restaurant operating-software specialization | Shift4 also serves hotels, venues and other verticals | Competes for restaurant merchant relationships |
| Fiserv — Clover | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: merchant acquiring and integrated POS | Bank/merchant distribution and Clover ecosystem | Different retained-fee and software mix | Competes for merchant processing |
| Adyen | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: enterprise omnichannel acquiring | Unified international acquiring platform | Less comparable to Shift4's vertical software distribution | Competes for enterprise payment flows |
| Global Payments; Worldpay | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: merchant processing | Established acquiring relationships | Not identical to Shift4's vertical integrated offering | Competes for processing contracts |
Embedded software integrations and operational reliability create switching costs. The advantage is moderate because merchants and software partners can change processors, and competitors have substantial scale. Acquisitions can strengthen coverage while increasing complexity.
Moat direction: Stable — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Embedded software integrations and operational reliability create switching costs. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2026. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 3,331 | 29.86% | 29.21% | 8.14% | 392 | 11.77% | 65 | 92 | 1,212 | 2,881 |
| FY2025 | 4,180 | 25.49% | 34.16% | 9.19% | 499 | 11.94% | 82 | 89 | 964 | 4,616 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $1,121 | N/D | N/D | 4.5% | $128 (derived: CFO - capex) | 11.4% | $16 | N/D | $473 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $1,295 | N/D | N/D | 7.3% | $57 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 4.4% | $31 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | N/D | $356 | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $2,416 | N/D | N/D | 6.0% | $185 (derived: CFO - capex) | 7.7% | $47 | N/D | $356 | N/D |
| Q3 FY2026 | $1,319 | N/D | N/D | 9.9% | $216 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 16.4% | $19 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | N/D | $1,242 | N/D |
| 9M FY2026 | $3,735 | N/D | N/D | 7.4% | $401 (derived: CFO - capex) | 10.7% | $66 | N/D | $1,242 | N/D |
Q2 adjusted EBITDA was $284 million, but operating cash flow was $63 million and adjusted FCF $21 million. TTM debt was approximately $4.57 billion. The per-share model uses earnings attributable to common holders after compensation, financing and economic noncontrolling claims. It does not assume publicly quoted Class A market capitalization captures the entire enterprise or capitalize headline EBITDA without subtracting debt and other claims.
The quoted share class is not the whole economic equity: the Up-C structure, noncontrolling interests and tax-receivable obligations matter. Whole-company EV is not relied on without a full exchange reconciliation. The separate model assumes 170 million fully economic shares in 2029, not the quoted 78.96 million Class A shares; this planning assumption is a material reason for lower confidence.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.49 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $3.19B (quoted Class A only) |
| Enterprise Value | N/A — not used; see capital/settlement accounting discussion |
| Trailing P/E | 64.79 |
| Provider forward P/E | 7.43 |
| EV / Sales | N/A — unadjusted metric excluded |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOUR — Shift4 Payments, Inc. | Subject company | Public | 7.43 | N/A — financial / share-class mismatch | integrated payments; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 15.92%; operating margin 8.64% |
| TOST — Toast, Inc. | Direct restaurant segment; narrower vertical exposure | Public | 20.96 | 2.52 | restaurant software and payments; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 19.03%; operating margin 6.26% |
| Fiserv — Clover | Direct segment: merchant acquiring and integrated POS | Operating product / listed parent | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for merchant processing |
| Adyen | Direct segment: enterprise omnichannel acquiring | Public | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for enterprise payment flows |
| Global Payments; Worldpay | Direct segment: merchant processing | Mixed / standalone valuation not used | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for processing contracts |
Comparable takeaway: Merchant acquiring, integrated POS and enterprise processing are the relevant markets. PayPal’s consolidated wallet business is excluded as an unhelpful broad payments anchor. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 15×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 7.43×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $24.43, versus the central base FV of $49.31. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 5%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.00 after compensation; 10× P/E; 15% discount rate; Weaker organic growth and financing pressure leave 2029 common-holder economic EPS at $2. | $13.15 | 30% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -68.3% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 14%; sustainable 2029 EPS $5.00 after compensation; 15× P/E; 15% discount rate; Integration succeeds and cash conversion recovers, producing $5 of 2029 economic EPS after all common-holder claims. | $49.31 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | +18.8% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 24%; sustainable 2029 EPS $8.00 after compensation; 18× P/E; 15% discount rate; Distribution scales with strong integration execution, producing $8 of 2029 economic EPS. | $94.68 | 20% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +128.2% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $47.54 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | +14.6% |
Management's acquisition and distribution execution has produced scale, but leverage, organizational change and financing costs warrant a lower confidence score. Monitor the full Up-C share and unit reconciliation, tax-receivable cash payments, acquisition integration and the gap between adjusted and actual cash earnings.
Monitor the full Up-C share and unit reconciliation, tax-receivable cash payments, acquisition integration and the gap between adjusted and actual cash earnings.
Analyzed call: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A · Research snapshot: 2026-10-21
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Dolev / Mizuho | How does management choose between buybacks and acquisitions? | Management said it balances the stock's valuation against expected strategic returns. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Rayna Kumar / Oppenheimer | How does financing support sales and growth plans? | Management said funding supports its growth initiatives. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Nate Svensson / Deutsche Bank | How could Middle East exposure affect results? | Management said near-term effects are limited, while later uncertainty remains. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Craig Maurer / FT Partners | What travel-demand visibility supports guidance? | Management said guidance reflects near-term booking visibility. | Treat the stated timetable as conditional on demonstrated execution. |
| Darrin Peller / Wolfe Research | How are cross-selling economics progressing against initial expectations? | Management said spreads exceed its initial annual expectations. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Sanjay Sakhrani / KBW | How do World Cup benefits relate to the broader international expansion? | Management said event benefits accompany the broader expansion. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Dan Perlin / RBC Capital Markets | How do cash investment and the tax-free-shopping business affect cash conversion? | Management said investment spending affects cash conversion. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
Cross-selling and international expansion support growth, while booking visibility remains short and cash investment matters. Capital structure and common-holder economics are unresolved constraints on valuation confidence.
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.sec.gov | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| FOUR complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| FOUR regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| FOUR valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| FOUR historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| FOUR historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| FOUR historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Toast, Inc. statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| 2025 10-K — named acquiring and integrated-payment competitors | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | FY2025; checked 2026-10-28 | Fiserv, Worldpay, Global Payments, Adyen and Toast product overlap |
| Clover restaurant POS | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current product page; checked 2026-10-28 | Specific merchant/restaurant POS overlap |
| SEC XBRL company facts — FOUR | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2026, through 2026-09-30 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
Company: Shift4 Payments, Inc.
Ticker: FOUR
Exchange: NYSE
Sector / Industry: Financials / integrated payments
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $41.49 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2025, FY 2024; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Company: Shift4 Payments, Inc.
Ticker: FOUR
Exchange: NYSE
Sector / Industry: Financials / integrated payments
Template version: 2.7
Research date: 2026-10-21
Valuation / score price snapshot: $41.49 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York
Tracking tier: Primary Watchlist
Owned: Yes
Primary operating period reviewed: Q2 2026
Historical period reviewed: TTM, FY 2025, FY 2024; latest balance-sheet date shown below
Latest investor presentation reviewed: Results release and associated financial tables; no separate slide deck materially used
Latest earnings call reviewed: Q2 2026, complete material Q&A
Latest post-earnings management commentary reviewed: No separate later management presentation incorporated
Price snapshot date: 2026-11-03
Price snapshot time / timezone: Regular-session close, America/New_York (including exchange half-days)
Competitor / analyst-Q&A audit: 2026-10-28; original operating, price and valuation snapshots retained.
Current Review: 2026-10-28
Previous Review: 2026-10-21
Update Trigger: Competitor relevance and analyst-Q&A correction
| Area | Previous View | Current View | Investment Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition | Preceding operating and comparable-company classifications | Product/customer/geographic boundaries corrected; direct rivals separated from substitutes, partners and valuation anchors | Corrects the competitive comparison; does not by itself re-underwrite the valuation |
| Analyst questions | Prior source-linked Q&A summaries | Complete questions and sentence-form management answers; all 7 existing rows retained | Improves readability while preserving the recorded exchange meaning |
| Valuation and scores | Approved operating/price snapshots, scenarios, scores and decisions | Preserved | No price refresh, rerank or change to valuation assumptions in this correction pass |
Thesis: No new fundamental thesis determination is made in this correction pass. The prior investment decision is preserved; the corrected competitive scope should govern the next substantive review.
| Metric | Current View |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.49 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Rating / Zone Status | Hold / Watch |
| Bear / Base / Bull Fair Value | $13.15 / $49.31 / $94.68 |
| Scenario Probabilities | 30% / 50% / 20% |
| Probability-Weighted Fair Value | $47.54 |
| Probability-Weighted Expected Return | +14.6% |
| Bear-Case Return | -68.3% |
| Strong Buy Zone | ≤ $14.47 |
| Buy Zone | >$14.47–$38.03 |
| Avoid Chasing Above | > $52.82 |
| Quality Score / Tier | 67.2 / Tier B |
| Opportunity Score / Rank | 53.6 / #40 of 76 |
| Risk Level | High |
| Tracking / Ownership | Primary Watchlist / Owned |
Decision rationale: FOUR is Hold / Watch at $40.46, with +17.5% probability-weighted upside and -67.5% bear-case return. Integrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. Confidence is 38/100 because the earnings conversion, competitive and capital assumptions below remain conditional.
Integrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. Q2 gross revenue rose 34% and retained revenue 51%, while organic retained-revenue growth was 11%. Adjusted FCF fell sharply and management reduced the outlook for travel-related disruption. Acquisition-driven scale cannot substitute for cash conversion.
| Debate | Research judgment |
|---|---|
| Organic retained-revenue growth and merchant retention | Integrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. |
| Debt service, TRA and Up-C claims | The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition. |
| Travel exposure and acquisition cash conversion | Q2 adjusted EBITDA was $284 million, but operating cash flow was $63 million and adjusted FCF $21 million. |
Shift4 combines payment acceptance with software integrations for restaurants, hotels, venues and other merchants. It monetizes end-to-end processing, subscriptions, gateway services and the acquired tax-free-shopping business. Software vendors and distribution partners help acquire merchants. Gross revenue includes substantial network fees, so gross revenue less network fees and gross profit better describe the retained economic opportunity. Its Up-C structure adds noncontrolling interests, exchangeable units and tax-receivable obligations to the valuation analysis.
Shift4 combines payment acceptance with software integrations for restaurants, hotels, venues and other merchants. The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition.
Merchant digitization and integrated payments support expansion, especially in complex hospitality workflows. Toast, bank acquirers and global processors compete on distribution, software and price. Tax-free shopping adds travel cyclicality and geopolitical exposure distinct from domestic processing.
Comparable same-definition share data for the subject and its principal rivals were not established. TAM estimates and company-specific volume measures are not treated as directly comparable market shares. The positioning analysis below is more reliable than a table of unmatched percentages.
| Company / Platform | Primary Position | Relative Scale | Growth Direction | Investment Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toast (TOST) | Direct segment: restaurant POS and integrated payments | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for restaurant merchant relationships | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Fiserv — Clover | Direct segment: merchant acquiring and integrated POS | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for merchant processing | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Adyen | Direct segment: enterprise omnichannel acquiring | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for enterprise payment flows | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
| Global Payments; Worldpay | Direct segment: merchant processing | Product scope; no matched operating-scale series | Competes for processing contracts | Customer choice in the stated segment only |
Tax-free shopping adds travel cyclicality and geopolitical exposure distinct from domestic processing. The base case requires evidence of profitable adoption within that market.
The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition. The latest quarter's $61 billion of volume demonstrates scale, but mix and distribution costs determine economic retention. Broader product coverage is valuable when it raises net profit per customer after funding and integration costs.
The economic test is Travel exposure and acquisition cash conversion. Broader product coverage is valuable when it raises net profit per customer after funding and integration costs.
Merchant acquiring, integrated POS and enterprise processing are the relevant markets. PayPal’s consolidated wallet business is excluded as an unhelpful broad payments anchor.
| Competitor | Market Share | Positioning | Advantages vs. Company | Disadvantages vs. Company | Current Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toast (TOST) | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: restaurant POS and integrated payments | Restaurant operating-software specialization | Shift4 also serves hotels, venues and other verticals | Competes for restaurant merchant relationships |
| Fiserv — Clover | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: merchant acquiring and integrated POS | Bank/merchant distribution and Clover ecosystem | Different retained-fee and software mix | Competes for merchant processing |
| Adyen | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: enterprise omnichannel acquiring | Unified international acquiring platform | Less comparable to Shift4's vertical software distribution | Competes for enterprise payment flows |
| Global Payments; Worldpay | No consistent comparable series | Direct segment: merchant processing | Established acquiring relationships | Not identical to Shift4's vertical integrated offering | Competes for processing contracts |
Embedded software integrations and operational reliability create switching costs. The advantage is moderate because merchants and software partners can change processors, and competitors have substantial scale. Acquisitions can strengthen coverage while increasing complexity.
Moat direction: Stable — an analytical judgment about product and distribution economics, not a measured market-share claim.
Embedded software integrations and operational reliability create switching costs. The direct rivals determine commercial pressure; diversified or sector anchors provide valuation context and are not substitutes for direct competition.
Financial reporting periods follow the issuer's fiscal year: completed FY rows plus standalone current-year quarters and cumulative H1/9M for FY2026. Revenue, FCF and SBC are flows; cash is a period-end balance. FCF = operating cash flow minus property/equipment capex from SEC company facts; quarterly FCF after Q1 and any quarterly SBC derived from YTD are visibly marked. Missing values are N/D, not zero. Unit: USD millions. Data extracted from SEC-tagged filings as of 2026-11-07. Company-specific FCF definitions and acquisition effects may require further reconciliation.
| Period | Revenue | Growth | Gross Margin | Operating Margin | FCF | FCF Margin | SBC | Diluted Shares | Cash | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | 3,331 | 29.86% | 29.21% | 8.14% | 392 | 11.77% | 65 | 92 | 1,212 | 2,881 |
| FY2025 | 4,180 | 25.49% | 34.16% | 9.19% | 499 | 11.94% | 82 | 89 | 964 | 4,616 |
| Q1 FY2026 | $1,121 | N/D | N/D | 4.5% | $128 (derived: CFO - capex) | 11.4% | $16 | N/D | $473 | N/D |
| Q2 FY2026 | $1,295 | N/D | N/D | 7.3% | $57 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 4.4% | $31 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | N/D | $356 | N/D |
| H1 FY2026 | $2,416 | N/D | N/D | 6.0% | $185 (derived: CFO - capex) | 7.7% | $47 | N/D | $356 | N/D |
| Q3 FY2026 | $1,319 | N/D | N/D | 9.9% | $216 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | 16.4% | $19 (derived: current YTD - prior YTD) | N/D | $1,242 | N/D |
| 9M FY2026 | $3,735 | N/D | N/D | 7.4% | $401 (derived: CFO - capex) | 10.7% | $66 | N/D | $1,242 | N/D |
Q2 adjusted EBITDA was $284 million, but operating cash flow was $63 million and adjusted FCF $21 million. TTM debt was approximately $4.57 billion. The per-share model uses earnings attributable to common holders after compensation, financing and economic noncontrolling claims. It does not assume publicly quoted Class A market capitalization captures the entire enterprise or capitalize headline EBITDA without subtracting debt and other claims.
The quoted share class is not the whole economic equity: the Up-C structure, noncontrolling interests and tax-receivable obligations matter. Whole-company EV is not relied on without a full exchange reconciliation. The separate model assumes 170 million fully economic shares in 2029, not the quoted 78.96 million Class A shares; this planning assumption is a material reason for lower confidence.
Financial direction: Mixed — assess the reported trend alongside dilution and the balance sheet.
Management's acquisition and distribution execution has produced scale, but leverage, organizational change and financing costs warrant a lower confidence score. Monitor the full Up-C share and unit reconciliation, tax-receivable cash payments, acquisition integration and the gap between adjusted and actual cash earnings.
Monitor the full Up-C share and unit reconciliation, tax-receivable cash payments, acquisition integration and the gap between adjusted and actual cash earnings.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price Snapshot | $41.49 — 2026-11-03 regular-session close, America/New_York |
| Market Capitalization | $3.19B (quoted Class A only) |
| Enterprise Value | N/A — not used; see capital/settlement accounting discussion |
| Trailing P/E | 64.79 |
| Provider forward P/E | 7.43 |
| EV / Sales | N/A — unadjusted metric excluded |
| Company | Relevance | Public / Private | Forward P/E | EV / Sales | Growth / Margin / Risk Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOUR — Shift4 Payments, Inc. | Subject company | Public | 7.43 | N/A — financial / share-class mismatch | integrated payments; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 15.92%; operating margin 8.64% |
| TOST — Toast, Inc. | Direct restaurant segment; narrower vertical exposure | Public | 20.96 | 2.52 | restaurant software and payments; 3Y revenue-growth estimate 19.03%; operating margin 6.26% |
| Fiserv — Clover | Direct segment: merchant acquiring and integrated POS | Operating product / listed parent | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for merchant processing |
| Adyen | Direct segment: enterprise omnichannel acquiring | Public | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for enterprise payment flows |
| Global Payments; Worldpay | Direct segment: merchant processing | Mixed / standalone valuation not used | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | N/D — no matched snapshot collected | Competes for processing contracts |
Comparable takeaway: Merchant acquiring, integrated POS and enterprise processing are the relevant markets. PayPal’s consolidated wallet business is excluded as an unhelpful broad payments anchor. Quoted multiples retain their original dated snapshot; missing matched multiples are not estimated. Consolidated parent multiples do not isolate the competing product. No mechanical peer average is used.
The base terminal P/E is 15×, versus the provider's current forward P/E of 7.43×. Holding that quoted multiple constant on this model's 2029 EPS gives an illustrative present value of $24.43, versus the central base FV of $49.31. Earnings definitions differ, so this is a sensitivity check; it makes the dependence on a rerating or derating explicit.
| Scenario | Key Assumptions | Fair Value | Probability | Probability Rationale | Return From Price Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | 3Y revenue CAGR 5%; sustainable 2029 EPS $2.00 after compensation; 10× P/E; 15% discount rate; Weaker organic growth and financing pressure leave 2029 common-holder economic EPS at $2. | $13.15 | 30% | Execution, financing or competitive setbacks remain credible | -68.3% |
| Base | 3Y revenue CAGR 14%; sustainable 2029 EPS $5.00 after compensation; 15× P/E; 15% discount rate; Integration succeeds and cash conversion recovers, producing $5 of 2029 economic EPS after all common-holder claims. | $49.31 | 50% | Most likely operating trajectory, requiring measurable progress | +18.8% |
| Bull | 3Y revenue CAGR 24%; sustainable 2029 EPS $8.00 after compensation; 18× P/E; 15% discount rate; Distribution scales with strong integration execution, producing $8 of 2029 economic EPS. | $94.68 | 20% | Successful product conversion and operating leverage; not assured | +128.2% |
| Probability-Weighted | Sum of each scenario value × its probability | $47.54 | 100% | Judgmental scenario probabilities | +14.6% |
The table consolidates related questions and follow-ups from each material participant in the complete call.
| Analyst / Firm | Core Question | Management Response | Research Read-Through |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Dolev / Mizuho | How does management choose between buybacks and acquisitions? | Management said it balances the stock's valuation against expected strategic returns. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Rayna Kumar / Oppenheimer | How does financing support sales and growth plans? | Management said funding supports its growth initiatives. | Judge allocation on per-share returns after financing and dilution. |
| Nate Svensson / Deutsche Bank | How could Middle East exposure affect results? | Management said near-term effects are limited, while later uncertainty remains. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Craig Maurer / FT Partners | What travel-demand visibility supports guidance? | Management said guidance reflects near-term booking visibility. | Treat the stated timetable as conditional on demonstrated execution. |
| Darrin Peller / Wolfe Research | How are cross-selling economics progressing against initial expectations? | Management said spreads exceed its initial annual expectations. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Sanjay Sakhrani / KBW | How do World Cup benefits relate to the broader international expansion? | Management said event benefits accompany the broader expansion. | Confirm that this opportunity converts into profitable recurring demand. |
| Dan Perlin / RBC Capital Markets | How do cash investment and the tax-free-shopping business affect cash conversion? | Management said investment spending affects cash conversion. | Require durable cash conversion after compensation and ongoing investment. |
Cross-selling and international expansion support growth, while booking visibility remains short and cash investment matters. Capital structure and common-holder economics are unresolved constraints on valuation confidence.
| Driver | Current State | Positive Trigger / Catalyst | Negative Trigger / Falsifier | What It Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic retained-revenue growth and merchant retention | Integrated distribution can support attractive growth and merchant retention, but leverage and acquisition complexity materially reduce confidence. | Revenue trajectory sustains approximately 14% annual growth on a comparable basis | Growth remains below the 5% bear assumption over a full operating cycle | Revenue outlook and scenario probabilities |
| Debt service, TRA and Up-C claims | The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition. | After-cost earnings progress toward the base implied net margin of 12.0% | Competition, credit losses or service costs make that margin trajectory unattainable | Margins, moat score and valuation multiple |
| Travel exposure and acquisition cash conversion | Q2 adjusted EBITDA was $284 million, but operating cash flow was $63 million and adjusted FCF $21 million. | Financing and compensation remain consistent with 170.0M economic shares in the 2029 base case | Required capital or cumulative dilution materially exceeds the model without matching earnings | Financial score, confidence and downside value |
| Component | Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business durability and economics | 74 | 25% | 18.5 | The relevant measures are processing volume, retained spread, gross profit per merchant, partner acquisition cost and merchant attrition. |
| Moat and competitive position | 70 | 25% | 17.5 | Embedded software integrations and operational reliability create switching costs. |
| Growth runway and durability | 80 | 20% | 16.0 | Merchant digitization and integrated payments support expansion, especially in complex hospitality workflows. |
| Financial quality and balance sheet | 48 | 15% | 7.2 | Q2 adjusted EBITDA was $284 million, but operating cash flow was $63 million and adjusted FCF $21 million. |
| Management, governance and capital allocation | 53 | 15% | 7.9 | Management's acquisition and distribution execution has produced scale, but leverage, organizational change and financing costs warrant a lower confidence score. |
| Quality Score | 67.2 | 100% | 67.2 | Weighted score, independent of ownership and current price |
| Component | Raw Input | Normalized Score | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | 67.2 | 67.2 | 30% | 20.2 |
| Probability-weighted upside | +14.6% | 79.2 | 35% | 27.7 |
| Bear-case downside | -68.3% | 0.0 | 20% | 0.0 |
| Risk / valuation confidence | 38 | 38.0 | 15% | 5.7 |
| Opportunity Score | 53.6 | 100% | 53.6 |
my_watchlist.mdportfolio/holdings.md| Timestamp | Price | Rating | Zone Status | Buy Zone | Strong Buy Zone | Avoid Chasing Above | Base FV | P/W FV | P/W Return | Quality | Opportunity / Rank | Change / Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 (America/New_York) | $40.46 | Hold / Watch | Hold / Watch | >$14.47–$38.03 | ≤ $14.47 | > $52.82 | $49.31 | $47.54 | +17.5% | 67.2 | 55.6 / #28 | Initial missing-file analysis; common-universe ranking; independent scenario assumptions |
| Source | Type | Date / Period | What It Supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| www.sec.gov | Company IR / earnings filing | Q2 2026 | Latest operating results, guidance, products and financial supplement |
| FOUR complete earnings-call transcript | Transcript | Q2 2026 | Prepared remarks and all material Q&A exchanges |
| FOUR regular-session historical price | Market data | 2026-10-20 close | Common price used in returns, scores and zones |
| FOUR valuation statistics | Market data | 2026-10-20 close; ratios retrieved 2026-10-21 | Market capitalization, shares, quoted multiples and current ratios |
| FOUR historical income statement | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical income statement; source-native currency and definitions |
| FOUR historical balance sheet | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical balance sheet; source-native currency and definitions |
| FOUR historical cash flows | Standardized financial statements | Latest reported period and two preceding fiscal years | Historical cash flows; source-native currency and definitions |
| Toast, Inc. statistics | Comparable-company market data | 2026-10-20 regular close | Peer multiples and financial context; public quote basis |
| 2025 10-K — named acquiring and integrated-payment competitors | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | FY2025; checked 2026-10-28 | Fiserv, Worldpay, Global Payments, Adyen and Toast product overlap |
| Clover restaurant POS | Regulatory filing / primary product evidence | Current product page; checked 2026-10-28 | Specific merchant/restaurant POS overlap |
| SEC XBRL company facts — FOUR | Regulatory filing (as tagged) | FY2026, through 2026-09-30 | Current-year standalone-quarter and year-to-date source facts for FCF, SBC, revenue and other reported metrics |
This page presents the saved FOUR analysis. Ratings, zones, and opportunity scores shown above are recalculated at its dated reference price using FolioFacts rules; the live Creator Watchlist uses current market prices and can differ. Missing financial data is not estimated.
This publication reflects my personal investment research, thoughts, and opinions only. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute personalized investment, legal, tax, or financial advice. Any ratings or views expressed are general analytical opinions, not recommendations tailored to any reader or offers or solicitations to buy or sell any security or financial instrument.
I am not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, or financial planner. This content does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation, or risk tolerance. All investments involve substantial risk, including the potential loss of all principal capital. Past performance is never indicative of future results.
While I endeavor to provide accurate information, all data and analysis are provided "as is" without any warranty of accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. You must conduct your own independent due diligence and/or consult with a licensed professional before making any financial decisions. I may hold long or short positions in any of the securities or assets discussed herein at any time without notice.
Quality is price independent. Opportunity combines that quality with scenario-based upside, bear-case protection, and confidence. Ownership and cost basis do not affect these scores. Watchlist rank compares the scored companies in that Watchlist.
Model scores, valuation estimates, and price zones are based on assumptions, not guarantees of future performance or individualized advice. Read our Disclaimer.
25% business durability
25% moat and competitive position
20% growth runway
15% financial quality
15% management and capital allocation
30% Quality Score
35% normalized probability-weighted upside
20% normalized bear-case return
15% risk and valuation confidence
At least 50% upside to P/W fair value, with price no more than 10% above bear-case fair value.
At least 25% upside to P/W fair value, above the Strong Buy boundary.
Modeled return from approximately −10% to below +25%.
More than 10% downside to P/W fair value.
Risk-adjusted view. This framework balances expected upside, downside risk and valuation confidence. Zones may be less reliable for companies priced mainly on future potential rather than current fundamentals.
These prompt a review of the research and Opportunity Score. Watchlist ranks are calculated automatically from the scores currently displayed.